Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Python

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-01 20:36

Someone else love it? I do.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-01 20:38

Ruby is better, [1, 2, 3, 4].length for teh win!

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-01 22:05

>>1
Yeh I like it. I already knew Java and tried to learn Perl but got nowhere, had a go with Python and really love it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 1:40

I thought it was really the most fucking stupid thing I had seen in a while when I found out that it uses leading spaces instead of curly braces or another character like most other languages.

I tried to force myself to learn it but couldn't get over how utterly dumb that was, so I gave up, since it doesn't really do anything other programming languages can't do better anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 1:53

>>2
| Ruby is another toy language nobody needs.

fixed

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 3:16

(Lisp) > @Ruby > __Python__ > $!"£%^&*Perl

Anonymous has spoken.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 5:19

Lisp + Ruby + Python = crap nobody asked for and nobody needs

Anonymous > Anonymous

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 6:33

I make a living off Python.

It's not the prettiest language out there, but it sure beats writing business apps in Java. If I had to do that, I think I'd quit coding and do something less brain-damaging, like being a garbageman high on acid and crack.

That'd be fun.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 6:50 (sage)

This thread will now segue to a discussion of JAVA SUX LOL

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 7:01

I like Python, it's a nice, clean language, a bit on the verbose side, but not enough to disgust me, and I like how it forces morons to properly indent their code, with which brackets and bracket matching become useless.

I also love its OO model; after seeing C++'s, Java's, and PHP's, I didn't like OO and thought it was a waste of time in most situations, but Python's OO got me interested for a number of reasons.

Compared to Java, Python is better for writing business applications, system applications, and any other applications for that matter, it's much nicer to work with, and has a sane powerful API. Then again, anything is better than Java to work with; only a kick in the balls would be worse.

Finally, it's the fastest of the popular scripting languages, slightly faster than Perl, and faster than PHP, Ruby, and JavaScript.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 8:06 (sage)

>>10
Python's OO is fucking braindamaged.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 8:14

While I agree with >>10's sentiment, >>11 is correct.

Some "Pythonic" ways of writing code are also retarded. I think the language would be better if the core Python community stopped being a bunch of fags.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 8:16

>>12
Especially GvR, what a fucking twat that guy is.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 9:28

>>10
| I like how it forces morons to properly indent their code
Quoted for great justice

Python's greatest weakness is that it's interpreted and thus slow.

But why would I care, Lisp > *

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 9:29

>>14
But why would I care, Lisp > *
QFT

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 16:53

>>10
>I didn't like OO and thought it was a waste of time

Seems you fail and aren't qualified at all to talk about programming. Bye.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-04 11:01

I love Python too.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-04 12:07

>>16
Yes, because clearly only those who have been indoctrinated into the cult of OO are allowed to talk about programming. Bye.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-04 14:12 (sage)

>>18
Cavemen/smug Lisp weenies are funny lol.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-04 15:04 (sage)

>>19
Which could have been true, had I used Lisp. Too bad I don't.
Your lack of ability for thought shows, now that's funny.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-04 15:22 (sage)

>>20
Not a smug Lisp weenie, eh? Caveman it is then.

QED

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-04 16:20

rofl. looks like /prog/ struck some java turd's nerves. Bottom line: We don't give a fuck.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-04 16:26 (sage)

>>21
Pity you fail at logic, so your argument doesn't hold. Maybe you should have paid more attention to how you constructed your sentence in the first place. But that'd involve you to actually think, which you've proven to be impossible. Pity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-04 19:14

Python? Wow I didn't realize somebody uses a worthless toy language like that.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-05 7:48 (sage)

>>23
Now you have to resort to insults? Wow.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-05 17:18

lol interwar.

I'm only just starting to learn, and python is my first language. I can't do much more than some extremely basic if commands and such, but it's fun to learn so far.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-06 9:37

Python is almost as good as Ruby. It's probably the best language for a lot of uses.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-06 9:56

Python and Ruby are almost half as good as Perl.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-06 16:13

>>28 has only ever used perl.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-07 1:17

>>29 learned ad hominem from his extensive Java bookshelf

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-07 2:11

>>30 is >>28

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-07 4:39

>>31
Does it freaking matter?

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-07 8:17

>>32
Sure it does. After all, only a complete uninformed dolt would have an opinion like that.

Unless, of course, you'd like to tell us more?

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-07 10:06

I like perl.
I don't like Turbo Pascal.
that's enough for me.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-07 18:34

If you have little experience with ruby or python, why claim that perl is far better?

"Its moar awesomes becuz i wants it so!" is a pretty sad way to think.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-08 16:12

If you have little experience with ruby or python, why claim that perl is far better?

Because I don't want to think that all the valuable time I invested in Perl is now useless, so I must drive other languages into the ground, and if enough people hate Ruby and Python, I won't have to deal with their possible superiority.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-08 17:41

>>36 is winnar.

I just wanted to add that if you're not prepared to learn new languages and new things, you shouldn't be in CS.

Sorry, guys, in this discipline you need to learn new things constantly. If you're not prepared to do that, may I suggest becoming a garbage man?

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-08 19:38

>>37

Please don't try to fool yourself into thinking that pissing about in Perl or whatever is equivalent to real Computer Science. That's like saying that soldering a few ICs onto a board is Physics.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-08 19:47

>>38
I think you may want to reread >>37 a bit more carefully. There are three words in there that make a difference.

Also, the design of languages, and their use, most certainly is CS. Some people seem to be under the mistaken assumption that CS is only discrete math, lambda calculus, and things like pushdown automata and grammars.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-09 15:04

>>39
Didn't you know? Failure to read is a requirement for posting here! You just run a word filter and read the words left

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-12 19:53

>>40
Wrong

You just have a quick look for keywords you troll on.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-13 8:18

>>10
>Then again, anything is better than Java to work with; only a kick in the balls would be worse.

You know, I think I'd rather take the kick than have to do SHIT in Java.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-13 8:28

>>42
There's a lot of hate for Java around here. I think it's because most of you have never had to use VB. Now there's a language worthy of firey hate of fire.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-13 16:22

>>43
* > VB > Java

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-13 19:25

>>44
Agreement and acceptance of terms

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-14 2:00

i leik java.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-14 4:10

>>46
Mork woar and you won't

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-17 13:56

* > Java > VB

(putting order among the scum at the bottom of the CS septic tank)

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-17 17:50

I'm trying to learn C#, thank god I didn't waste time with Java!

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-17 19:23 (sage)

* > VB > Java > >>48

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-17 23:08

>>50 I see what you did there.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-17 23:20

>>49

C# is the best .Net language IMO. Managed C++ = (useless + crap)IMO.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-18 0:13

>>52

Then your opinion is obviously worthless.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-18 5:19

>>53 So C# isn't the best of the .Net languages, or Managed C++ isn't useless?

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-18 6:56

>>52
"Managed" anything that can be compiled = useless + crap. Don't let marketing manage your balls.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-18 7:33 (sage)

>>52
>>53
>>54
>>55
VB is clearly the bestlololol

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-19 10:57

Look at bram cohen's code and you'll see what is wrong with python (20 arguement constructors with no type checking).l

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-21 19:36

Bram Cohen is a hippie with a jewish name; what did you expect?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 10:29

>>59 GET

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 10:31

Usuaully people love python because they don't know anything else other than Java

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 10:51

I think people love it because of ONE WORD,
FORCED INDENTATION OF THE CODE,
THReAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 10:57

I like Python.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 13:49

I like forced indentation.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 14:07

I like code.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 14:19

I like boobs.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 14:56

[aa]what does do?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 15:05

I like big butts and I am unable to tell a lie.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 16:33

My anaconda does not desire to have any, that which is honey, unless you have an indefinite but more than one amount of "buns", again, that which is honey.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List