Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

scheme, lisp, pascal, other useless shit...

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-15 20:25

why do people still bother?

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-18 3:09

>>39
they are full of assembly.

It's obvious you've never read one. Maybe 5% of pages have code on them, while at least 90% are FULL OF MATH! WHOA!

Also, >>40 is either irony, or pure idiocy.

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-18 15:50

>>40
Regardless of what you think of the quality. Referring to Knuth as "some random guy" is a clear indication that one has no interest in the field whatsoever. It  should be obvious that people with a clear interest in everything that goes on in the field have a higher change to think outside of the box, and come up with a creative solution.

Lisp programmers are better programmers, not because of Lisp, but because they have learned a langauge that hardly has any practical value.

Industry has caught on to that and is actively recruiting programmers with Python/Ruby skills, to deploy them on Java projects, just because they chose to learn /more/ then just the stuff they were forced to learn on university.

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-18 20:34

>>42
Yeah, but it's kind of a waste to use a Python programmer on Java. I'd rather have him doing Python, which is more productive and maintainable.

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-19 7:07

>>36
prolog ?

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-19 7:59

Where I live:

Interviewer: So, I noticed on your resume you know C, C++, perl, and... python and ruby?
Interviewee: Yes. I still like using C sometimes, even assembler, but most my work I do in Python and Ruby. Of course, I favour using the right tool for the job, so sometimes I use other languages too.
Interviewer: I also note you know Java.
Interviewee: Uh... yes. Why?
Interviewer: Well, recently we decided to port our primary software product to Java.
Interviewee: O SHI I GOTTA GO!

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-19 18:39 (sage)

A lot of e-cock comparing going on here. amirite?

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-20 3:37 (sage)

My e-cock is bigger than your e-cock, and imrite.

Name: 2005-12-21 17:41 (sage)

>>46
That's what /prog is about

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-05 7:02 ID:GDEUEVr3

>>45
lol

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-05 7:33 ID:BzUpiEA+

>>49
Bumping faggot

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-14 17:23


test

Name: ​​​​​​​​​​ 2010-10-24 15:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:41

<-- check em dubz

Name: 2012-01-25 6:49

Name: 2012-01-25 6:50


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List