>>123
Unless Microsoft is involved in some way. Then it's always Microsoft's fault, amirite?
Don't forget everyone that these errors come because of people enforcing unrecommended settings and being sucky programmers. Perhaps Windows's problem is it has kind of an exponential learning curve; it's very easy to start using it, but it's also very easy to do it all wrong. There are some functions you shouldn't use, and ways of doing stuff which are far better than others, but noobs don't realize this and this is why a lot of Windows code sucks. This is why it's being overly bashed in some scenes. But there ARE good Windows programmers out there. And once you get it right, you can be very productive with it, and it has a cleaner syntax, which matters to me.
Whee! Let's try that with Linux!
Don't forget everyone that these errors come because of people enforcing unrecommended settings and being sucky programmers. Perhaps Linux's problem is it has kind of an exponential learning curve; it's very easy to start using it, but it's also very easy to do it all wrong. There are some functions you shouldn't use, and ways of doing stuff which are far better than others, but noobs don't realize this and this is why a lot of Linux code sucks. This is why it's being overly bashed in some scenes. But there ARE good Linux programmers out there. And once you get it right, you can be very productive with it, and it has a cleaner syntax, which matters to me.
>>127
Impressive deduction, A+
>>125
Now SOA is the next 'big thing'. Funny thing is, SOA is very non OO, but that doesn't stop Java from fucking it up. Java asshats need to stop trying to pollute everything with Java; we don't want your shit. Right tool, right job, asshats.