Alex Jones - Infowars

I think Alex Jones lost it when he said that meteorites were regional to the Soviet Union... An astronomical anomaly to the very mathematics of his statistical examples.

I want to introduce you to the ultimate weapon against the globalists and their luciferian agenda, Tangy Tangerine. This quality drink mix is 100% free of GMO's and is probably the only vitamin and mineral drink I will ever take for getting my daily vitamins. I'm getting up in my years and life is catching up with me so I now drink this vitamin drink every day. It has been working fine for me and last time I went to the doctors and had blood work done it all looked good.

Tangy Tangerine is available today at the infowar shop, supplies however are limited and running out quickly so order now.

Alex "Butthurt" Jones is a faggot and fake patriot.

He pays his Burger King in British Pounds, which says enough...

>>3

True that m8

I remember trying to listen to one of his lectures. It lasted some two minutes, until he used the intro to call the Clintons "Socialists". Stopped listening right there.

I later learned that this is a symptom of the whole US; "Socialist" and "Communist" are used as some sort of cover-all label for "something I don't agree with", because retards won't look up what those words actually mean.


By comparison, David Icke will talk (relative) sense about the Illuminati for an hour or so, before going off with those two-meter shape-shifting space-lizards of his…

>>5
Their choice of words is inflammatory but the argument is reasonable depending on how you interpret it. Socialism means communal ownership over the means of production, that can be interpreted as the government's justification for many of its economic policies as well as the justification used by many "people's republics". This splits people into 2 groups, people who see the word "socialist" and instantly ignore the argument and people who see others ignoring what they believe to be a reasonable argument.

A better argument would be just to explain the limitations of government and bureaucracy in representing the people, but that would not suit the purposes of Alex Jones or David Icke.

>>6
Too often I hear «Socialist» being defined as «gummint doing actual stuff with taxpayer money, not just lining the pockets of corrupt fatcats». By that «logic», however, all governments everywhere are socialists; after all, every nation has some sort of police force. Some (like the US) even have public schools.

That kind of thing is what I mean by «retards won't look up what those words actually mean».

>>7
What is wrong with the argument is the confusing way in which they put it across, not that it is so out of the ordinary.

The workforce needs to be educated to be productive, so public schools are a means of production in a way. If you were to judge the world by their school systems alone it might well be indistinguishable from a socialist world, which would also presumably have public schools.

Only sith deals in absolutes, we should describe the means of production as being part public and part private, as it is, as opposed to naming things as though they are part of an entirely public system (socialist) or an entirely private system (anarcho-capitalist).

If you've read "So long and thanks for all the fish [1986]", you'd know that ancient space robots will ask you to direct them to the nearest Reptilian "Lizard" that runs the nation.

"Democracy by representation" is dead IMO.

Let's do it like in Switzerland: direct democracy in every issue.

More food for the trolls as well. ;)