Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Myth of Jewish Conspiracy

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-01 4:49

Conspiracy: "An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act." (The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition)

http://www.eurojewcong.org/about-us/
Over 25 years ago, European Jewish communities decided to merge their activities and unite their efforts. As the sole political organizational representative of European Jewry, the EJC protects the interests of its affiliated communities, working daily with European Union institutions and officials

So Jews conspired to protect Jewish interest not through public system, like all honest citizens, but through a fraternal organization, "working daily with European Union institutions and officials" (read subversion)

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-01 6:42

Aren't political organizations public systems?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-01 11:22

>>2
Nope. "EJC protects the interests of its affiliated communities"

i.e. protects only Jewish interest. It doesnt protect Africans, Slavs or Asians.


We have a serious case of racism and anti-social behavior.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-01 14:10

>>3
No, >>2 meant in general, not just your (corner; he did say "sole ... representative") case.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-01 20:59

>>3
>We have a serious case of racism and anti-social behavior.
Oh the irony.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-01 23:40

>>4
No. In general organizations like “Jewish National-Socialistic Party” would be considered extremist.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-01 23:43

>>5
Using other's nationalism to justify your own is a common practice. For example, Serbs killed Bosniaks, because Bosniaks killed Serbs and vice versa. Our job is to escalate it into a war.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 9:14

>>6
That has nothing to do with the particular topic strand we're following.

Aren't political organizations public systems?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 9:17

>>7
Just because it is "common" does not mean it is a good thing.  It's pointless and should be stopped for many more reasons than just being pointless, bar the existence of more tactile grievances in the affair.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 10:51

>>9
Separatism and conflict are a good things. Peace and cooperation lead to stagnation.

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_escalation_during_World_War_II

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 11:00

>>10
There's also technological progression outside of wartime.  The conflict is not a necessary impetus and creates more complications than the technology can solve within the same realistic time frame.  Additionally, those who say that "peace and cooperation lead to stagnation" only understand progress in broad visual aspects, losing the sublety that underlies effort and achievement.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 14:31

>>10
Of course military technology improves during war, that doesn't mean overall technological progress improves.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 15:02

>>12
The Internet, you're using now, was developed as a military technology, during cold war.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 15:05

>>13
Then again, medicine got enormous boost, due to being able to test hypotheses directly human material.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 20:10

>>13
While the LHC ,graphene and carbon-nano tube technology has made leaps and bounds despite a complete lack of any major war.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 0:06

>>15
http://www.nanocleantechblog.com/2012/01/27/military-leads-early-2012-funding-of-nanotech-u-s-patent-publications/

nano-technology would a key to victory in the upcoming wars. Why using inefficient weapon, when you can write a virus, which will wipe out entire enemy population?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 6:28

>>16
Because that would be a violation of international law today?

Sorry, bro. But war isn't the driving factor here.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 10:15

>>17
Why would oligarchy care about laws, it writes itself?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 10:16

>>18
Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 15:07

>>16
Isn't that the plot to deus ex 1?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 15:07

When Bobby Fischer says "Jews" he actually means "Machines". The greatest threat to a human chess player are the machines that can think several more moves ahead of said player.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 16:10

>>18
You tell me. Why would it care, if it wasn't just a fantasy you pulled out of your arse? Why haven't the Jews with their apparently vastly superior of science and iron grip on 99.9% of everything used bio-chemical weapons to wipe out every non-Jew? Careful how you bullshit your way out of that one, bro because you've got to explain why they haven't already but also why they're going to do it in the future too.

>>20
No, that's MGS4.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 2:54

>>20>>22
Video games are useless crap for decadent western degenerates with their welfare. China even banned them, so Chinese kids wont waste their youth.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 2:57

>>22
Why haven't the Jews with their apparently vastly superior of science and iron grip on 99.9% of everything used bio-chemical weapons to wipe out every non-Jew?
1. there is still no such weapon.
2. Jews do reduce world population, spreading AIDS, sterilizing vaccines, wars and drugs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 3:01

>>24
also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Marching_Morons explains well Jewish view on the problem.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 9:18

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 13:56

>>23
Didn't you learn English just so you could play Final Fantasy VII? That's what you said.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 14:01

>>27
Yes. So?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 18:58

>>28
Really? Do I have to explain? If videos games are "useless crap for decadent western degenerates with their welfare" and you play video games... 1 + 1 = ?

By the way, what you said about China is completely untrue. They are not banned and huge numbers of people in China play them, not to mention make cheap knock offs of original games and call them their own.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-05 0:40

>>29
you play video games...
Yes. I wasted time. So?

>They are not banned

China's State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television(SARFT)(国家广电总局) affected the world of Chinese online games in 2004 by instating a blanket ban on computer game related commercials in the state-run media.

The ministry has also been instrumental in combating the growing problem of Internet addiction and game addiction in China by teaming up with eight other government outlets concerned with the growing effect of game play on China's youth.


"Consoles have been banned in China since the year 2000," Lisa Hanson from market researcher Niko Partners tells Kotaku. "The government thought that was the best way to protect Chinese youth from wasting their minds on video games, after a parental outcry." The following year, online gaming exploded, and the market size hit $100 million. So the ban, Hanson says, "didn't stop the 'problem'."

A recent article on Chinese news site Sina.com points out, "In June 2000, the Ministry of Culture issued a notice, forbidding any company or individual to produce and sell electronic game equipment and accessories to China."

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-05 1:04

>>30
"With all the horrible stuff that comes from and happens in China, I can say China is probably one of the most ungodly places in the world.
Makes me so glad that I live in America."

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List