Hypothesis

Have you noticed, that Germany became even more Jewish since WW2?

Take for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Merkel
Her mother was once a member of the Social Democratic Party of Germany.[8] In an interview with Der Spiegel in 2000, Merkel stated that she was one quarter Polish.

Then we all know, that there was no Holocaust and most "genocided" Jews now live in Israel.

All this leads to a hypothesis that it were the Jews, who genocided a large part of German population, filling it's space with their own offsprings. Just like Jews did in Russia, while ethnic Russians died in WW2, Jews produced kids.

Jews, jews everywhere.

>>2
The reaction to the appointment of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court in 2010 was a case study in how taboos are maintained in our society regarding the 600-pound gorilla of Jewish power. It is not just that little was said about the fact that she would be the third Jewish justice on the nine-member court in a country barely two percent Jewish, leaving the majority-Protestant country without a Protestant on the high court. It is not just that she was generally lacking in qualifications for the appointment and for pretty much every other job she has ever gotten. What was really interesting was how the Jewish media diverted attention from the phenomenon of Jewish power and privilege by raising the specter of White privilege. And when I say specter, I really mean ghost, because White privilege for all intents and purposes is dead and gone, as the Elena Kagan nomination “controversy” illustrates.

>>3
It was noted on some sites that the faculty at leading schools like Harvard were largely Jewish, and there was a list of all current law professors at Harvard, but nobody had a list of the 32 professors that Kagan hired. So, using the internet archive service called “the Wayback Machine,” I found a list of Harvard Law School’s tenured or tenure-track professors shortly before Kagan’s appointment and another shortly after her departure. Naturally, it came as no surprise to find that easily half of the list had Jewish-sounding surnames. Of course, surnames are not rock-solid indicators of someone’s ethnicity, so I went down the list one-by-one to see if I could find any reliable sources demonstrating that a professor either was or was not Jewish. Working alphabetically, at first it seemed it would be easy as two of the first professors whose backgrounds I checked were not just Jewish but Israeli. But it then started becoming tedious, as many of the younger recent hires have little biographical data on the internet. My preliminary results thereby are as follows:

Confirmed Jews: 8
Probable Jews: 7
Married to a Jew: 2
Probable non-Jew: 5
Confirmed non-Jew: 3
Uncertain: 7

The eight confirmed Jews are Noah Feldman, Yochai Benkler, Gabriella Blum, Robert H. Sitkoff, Cass R. Sunstein, Mark Tushnet, Jesse M. Fried, and Jed Shugerman. Benkler and Blum are Israelis. The seven probable Jews are I. Glenn Cohen, Jody Freeman, John C.P. Goldberg, William Rubenstein, Michael Klarman, Daryl Levinson, and Benjamin Sachs. In the cases of Klarman and Levinson there were probable indications in addition to their surnames. The two professors married to Jews were Anne Alstott and Jeannie Suk. Alstott was married in a synagogue and her mother’s maiden name was Kincaid, so she also should be considered a probable Jew. Jeannie Suk is Korean (the lone “non-White”) and is married to Noah Feldman. There was quite a lot on the internet regarding this marriage, as Feldman is Orthodox and was lambasted by other Orthodox Jews for having married outside his group. He in turn complained that he and his wife were Photoshopped out of a picture of his Orthodox high school reunion. It is unclear whether Suk has converted to Judaism.

>>4
Jews, who make up only 2% of the U.S. population, get at least half of the appointments. In other words, their share of Kagan’s hirings was 25 times their share of the U.S. population. But all we heard in the media was that “all but one of her appointments was White.”

Academia has its own gatekeepers. They insure that important professions have significant Jewish over-representation and weed out people who are viewed as hostile to Jewish privilege. Kagan was an academic gatekeeper at Harvard. Her career advancement was always based as much, if not more, on Jewish privilege than on merit. Her appointments of Jews to at least half of the posts she filled while dean of Harvard Law School would seem to be her way of paying back those who paved the Easy Street of her career to date. (Larry Summers, who as President of Harvard appointed Kagan dean of the law school despite her lack of scholarly publications is particularly noteworthy.) The appointments also helped to preserve the effective Jewish veto over who gets into and who gets out of America’s most prestigious law school, a veto which certainly exists in other leading universities and in other academic departments. These privileges can continue without public outrage because of the Jewish gatekeepers of the media stifle discussion of it and anyone who tries to break the taboo does so at the risk of career loss.

>>5
The inclusion of Jews in “whites” is an amazingly cunning way of disguising Jewish activity (and power) while simultaneously reducing white European activity and influence (by using up their “quota” for them).

You did a good job coordinating this discussion.  I'm quite impressed at >>4's typing and memory skills: a queue of names, placed into specific groups, and probably spelled correctly, and detailing complicated biographical research, typed up in under ten minutes.

>>8
Shalom!

>>8
And all people of the earth shall see that thou are called by the name of the LORD; and they shall be afraid of thee.

And the LORD shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath; if that thou shalt hearken unto the commandments of the LORD thy God, which I command thee this day, to observe them and to do them... (Deuteronomy 28:9-13)

And the LORD thy God will put out those nations before thee by little and little: thou mayest not consume them at once, lest the beasts of the field increase upon thee. But the LORD thy God shall deliver them unto thee, and shall destroy them with a mighty destruction, until they be destroyed. And he shall deliver their kings into thine hand, and thou shalt destroy their name from under heaven: there shall no man be able to stand before thee, until thou have destroyed them. The graven images of their gods shall ye burn with fire (Deuteronomy 7:22-25)

But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire. 6 For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth. (Deuteronomy 7:5)

The LORD shall open unto thee his good treasure, the heavens to give the rain unto thy land in his season, and to bless all the work of thy hand: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow.

>>10
Organized Jewry employs methods that are outside the scope of experience of individual human beings and so the intelligence of individual human beings is inadequate to defend against these methods. The Jewish evolutionary strategy pursues its aims across geographic borders and with sustained effort over centuries at a time. As the only nation to maintain in diaspora its identity and its ability to act in a coordinated fashion, the Jews have an advantage akin to having a Ring of Invisibility. Non-Jewish social institutions have not evolved to defend against coordinated infiltration. Infiltrated cultural institutions, such as education and mass media, then condition youthful non-Jews to arrive at innocent interpretations of Jewish group strategies, e.g. “they are just seeking redress of past wrongs,” or “they just have a stronger family-feeling,” or “they just happen to be Jewish.” Even for the very intelligent, it often takes decades to amass enough personal experience of the discrepancy between Jewish self-propaganda and organized Jewish behavior to begin to question the authorized narratives. This awakening is generally a lonely one. It then takes years to realize that one is not alone and that this is a lesson that has been learned wherever non-Jews have encountered groups of Jews.

Only social institutions alerted to long-time scale and trans-national Jewish group evolutionary strategies can defend against those strategies.

>>11
What are the basics of this "jewry" then?