/newpol/ - Screenshots is Copyright Infringement

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 15:41

You wouldn't steal a car!
Don't take pictures!
Don't even LINK to pictures!
Piracy - it's a crime!

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/09/dutch-court-rules-linking-to-photos-is-copyright-infringement/

Name: 4ct !3lWjo8kf8k 2012-09-14 16:15

Well would you want people taking what is yours for free, well would you!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 17:04

You're also a criminal if someone else uses your internet connection to pirate songs.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19597429

This anti-piracy push is insane. It's like a wild fucking rhinoceros charging down a series of tubes, gouging random onlookers who don't really harm the "industry" in the slightest.

What's next? Should we be fined for talking about how to find songs/pictures of shitty, no-talent pop music and ugly softcore porn?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 17:11

The greatest crime anyone ever committed is when someone suggested that it would be a crime to promote the same copy of a random string of ones and zeros that someone also has and yet somehow promoting the same religion someone else has is still somehow made legal.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 17:19

Copying intelligent educational data is illegal but copying idiotic religious anti-data isn't? What kind of backwards society are we living in? Is this why everyone is so stupid in every point in history?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 19:57

>>5
Passing on an idea isn't the same as copying a digital capture of an idea. Me passing on a song I learned to you is different from me burning the same song on a to distribute for a fee. It's basically all about the format.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 21:34

Another example of how the industrial paranoia has gone completely bananas.

As such, it's become a religion; "I know what I know, don't confuse me with facts". In the industry's case, it's the oh-so-not-religious dogma that civilisation itself will somehow come crashing down the moment they fail to gouge every single bystander they can get their hands around, regardless of actual guilt.

Or, to put it more bluntly:
The copyright industry thinks everyone's like them.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 23:01

>>1
I'm sure, major Playboy shareholders are Jewish, so the less people know about Playboy - the better. In fact, if Netherlands were nationalistic country, they would have banned a foreign trademark at all.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 23:03

>>8
Also, porn is wrong. People should search for real girls instead.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 23:35

>>9
Real girls made the porn.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-20 9:34

>>10
Not the hentai.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-20 11:02

>>13
Unfortunately they don't have loli monster dick girls in real life, so I'll stick with my hentai.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 8:55

>>1
Gone bananas. Coffer is emptied again. please(?) pay through the nose.
--MAFIAA

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 15:33

>>13
Actually quite a few japanese erotica artists are in fact real girls. Maybe even close to half. They may even be the majority.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 19:28

>>15
This. It's money grabbing. Your business model is a total failure and your product worthless garbage? Sue everyone!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 14:02

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/08/mars-landing-videos-and-other-casualties-robot-wars

NASA's successful landing on Mars of an SUV-sized nuclear rover from a rocket-skycrane should have marked a high point in collaborative accomplishments between humans and robots. But here on Earth the situation was a bit more tense. That's because, just hours after the celebrated touchdown, Vice Magazine's Motherboard blog broke the news that one of NASA's official clips from the mission had been pulled from YouTube, replaced with a notice from the video site indicating that the "video contains content from Scripps Local News, who has blocked it on copyright grounds."

http://motherboard.vice.com/2012/8/6/nasa-s-mars-rover-crashed-into-a-dmca-takedown

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 20:26

>>18
That sucks bro. Even space isn't immune from the influence of these evil lawyers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 21:23

>>19
But space needs more lawyers. Why shouldn't space enjoy legal representation?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 11:49

>>20
http://youtu.be/Z1roP52Py7s

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-08 19:27

>>19
Reminds me of that quote,
Aim for the moon; Even if you miss, you'll be among the stars…
…suffocating…

We shouldn't hate on lawyers for being good at what they do. They're just doing a job.

The key phrase here is "Follow the money". Check who's laying out the jobs for those lawyers to be doing. The employers.

Then look at the lawyers that take that job.
The difference is subtle, but significant.

Screenshots is Copyright Infringement

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 15:41

2 Name: 4ct !3lWjo8kf8k 2012-09-14 16:15

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 17:04

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 17:11

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 17:19

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 19:57

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 21:34

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 23:01

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 23:03

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-14 23:35

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-20 9:34

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-20 11:02

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 8:55

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 15:33

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 19:28

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 14:02

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 20:26

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 21:23

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 11:49

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-08 19:27