Stop Linux!

http://stoplinux.org.ru

Let the Unix shit die.

Yes. People should be using Plan 9, anyway.

>>2
How Plan 9 is better than Lisp OS?

>>3
Because Bell Labs did it right with the first implementation in 1992, whereas emacs has been bloatware since day one. Like most GNU software.

ITT, people bitchn because their favorite operating system is relatively unknown.

>>4
Emacs was written by a Jewish author - Stallman. That is why it sucks. But there is nothing wrong with Lisp, beside the MIT Jews, like McCarthy, Minsky and Chomsky, smeared Lisp's good name with a big AI fraud.

>>6
BTW, watched some youtube videos and found this old commie kike demagogue Chomsky is still alive! Shame America had no patriot to kill Chomsky in his youth, before he succeeded doing too much damage.

>>7
Yeah, can't have Americans that know words with more than seven letters, right? Or sentences wore more than seven words? (He is, after all, a linguist by trade)

Or do you mean it does damage that a nation has some actual differences in opinion?

Srsly, just looked at http://www.politicalcompass.org/
They could reveal that even Obama (to say nothing of Romney) is way to the right of Adolf Hitler. Is that your idea of a «commie»?

>>8
Proofreading error
s/wore/with/

>>8
He is, after all, a linguist by trade
Just like Marvin Minsky, Chomsky produced a few hyped theories, which failed in practice. Still in USSR Chomsky was represented as a rare genius, an Einstein of computer science. That was a big fraud (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_winter)

>>10
So an idea has trouble working properly, and the only thing it can possibly ever be caused by, is deliberate fraud. No underestimating of the scope or anything, nohoho.
Wow, how very very logical.


When Edison was researching suitable-looking materials for filaments in incandescent light bulbs, he was supposedly once asked if it wasn't a failure that he hadn't found one that worked yet. To which he replied "We've identified 500 materials that we know don't work. You call that failure?"

You come up with a new idea to be tested. If it works, great. Now find out how and why, so we can build on that knowledge. Even if it doesn't, find out how and why. There'll still be stuff to learn. That's how science works.

Even the famous quest for cures for cancer &stuff, get to be useful, whether we ever actually find the cure or not. We find out new stuff on the way. Much of it we would never have found without this quest.

>>11
So an idea has trouble working properly, and the only thing it can possibly ever be caused by, is deliberate fraud.
It was. Jews promised many, producing nothing. I.e. Jews lied. And the whole academia process was compromised, because modern U.S. academia has Jews all around (i.e. Jews can falsify anything they want).

Even the famous quest for cures for cancer &stuff, get to be useful, whether we ever actually find the cure or not. We find out new stuff on the way. Much of it we would never have found without this quest.
The funny thing, that the MIT Jews found nothing, spending millions.

>>12
You're not familiar with this scientific method thing, are you?

>>13
I'm familiar with the Jews.

>>14
And clearly little else.

>>15
Shalom!

I never trust any site with ".ru" on the end.

>>16
We already know you're a moron, no need to prove it again.

>>16
That wasn't a well placed "shalom". Quality is far more important than quantity in communication, unless you're a spammer.

>>17
Just use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opera_browser

Opera is probably the least Jewish company around there, while Mozilla is so much evil, it even has a Star of Solomon on its logo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mozilla_logo.svg)

Just boycott Firefox.

>>19
please, define "well placed".

I reply "shalom" to all your ad hominem posts.

>>18
Shalom!

>>20
Because your posts aren't ad hominem in the least, nohoho.
Also, retarded spam is retarded.

>>21
Where exactly my posts are ad hominem, Jew? And calling you a Jew isnt ad hominem at all, because you act like a Jew, Hymie. Same for calling all the Jews criminals, because all the Jews commit crimes.

>>20
Not only jews make ad hominem posts. It doesn't make any sense that this should be where you place your "shaloms".

>>23
But only a Jew would react to a Nazi post with emotional ad hominem, because the Jews have no better argument. I.e. a Jew cant prove that Chomsky and other Jewish snake oil salesmen did anything good in their life, so a Jew uses ad hominem.

>>23
Additionally, he's also replied "Shalom" to posts that have nothing to do with ad hominem, but instead contain simple arguments, whether or not they are good or bad arguments.  The excessive use of them is why they frequently get criticized as being what is posted when he runs out of points to make.

>>24
Now that's something that you can't prove either, though it might be something you want to believe.  There are idiots and there are Jews, to paraphrase a copypasta frequently used in the past, and while there's no indication that there aren't also idiot Jews (they're all evil according to you), you default to assume people who passionately dislike killing or xenophobic reactions for any reason as the latter.  Some of us aren't comfortable with the idea of really hating a particular group of people and whatever we do express is tongue and cheek.  When the actual racists come out, we redirect them (back) to Stormfront.

>>25
Jewish posts
contain arguments
Shalom! Jews cant present any argument, because the Jews are fundamentally wrong. I.e. whatever sophistry Jews says about Palestinian conflict, they wont stop being occupants and murderers.

Now that's something that you can't prove either, though it might be something you want to believe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof

There are idiots and there are Jews
Godchosen!

people who passionately dislike killing or xenophobic reactions for any reason as the latter.
Shabbos goyim (i.e. race traitors) and idiots. Evolution will purge them.

Some of us aren't comfortable with the idea of really hating a particular group of people and whatever we do express is tongue and cheek.
Why would anyone love the Jews or allow them inside his nation?

When the actual racists come out, we redirect them (back) to Stormfront.
May I redirect you back to Israel, Hymie?

>>22
ad hominem
By repeatedly dictating that I be Jew, whether I really am or not (protip: I ain't), with sub-fucking-zero evidence, beyond the clearly annoying little factoid that I fail to agree with you -- which is also not evidence.

Not to mention that those retarded shitpost-trolling shalom-parrots of yours, is also the ONLY argument you can come up with. (beyond the equally mindlessly parroted "all Jews are criminals")

You're not exactly showing any signs of non-Yid intelligence.


And for the record: I'm actually whiter than you. Not to mention Atheist (I hate _all_ Abrahamic religions, equally).
But you're starting to make me feel ashamed to be Goy.

BTW, just did a quick count...

Posts actually on topic: 1-5

Posts containing "Jew": 6,12,14,20,22-27
Posts containing "shalom": 16,19,20,23,25,26
Posts otherwise off topic: 7-11,13,15,17,18

Where's your precious Shalom now, troll?
(A: Thoroughly off topic, that's where.)

>>27
By repeatedly dictating that I be Jew, whether I really am or not (protip: I ain't), with sub-fucking-zero evidence, beyond the clearly annoying little factoid that I fail to agree with you -- which is also not evidence.
Only the Jews and the idiots defend the Jews. Are you a Jew or an idiot?

those retarded shitpost-trolling shalom-parrots of yours
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man. I can call your post shitposting, because it doesnt bring any new insight.

>>28
Shalom!

>>29
If you'd been less obsessed with that neverending Reductio Ad Iudaeum of yours, and more into actually _reading_ what you're responding to, then you'd been able to spot that I wasn't defending Jews. I was objecting to the retarded faggotry of your incessant string of shitposts.

Gah. Just let me know when /b/ is back up, and we'll be rid of you.

>>30
I wasn't defending Jews.
But in >>25 you say you're against "xenophobic reactions for any reason"! You just contradicted yourself.

I was objecting to the retarded faggotry of your incessant string of shitposts.
But objecting against antisemitism IS defending the Jews. You contradicted yourself second time, like a true kike! Jews seemingly strive to make every their statement contradictory, like the Jews lying they werent involved in revolutions, while even fucking Fidel Castro is Jewish.

Comrade >>31,
Not >>25. As in, I'm not the only one getting tired of you.

Also, learn2read. Don't just keep making shit up, read. If you even know how, that is.

What I am objecting to, is how you keep dragging Jews into contexts where [i]they don't fkin [b]belong[bi][/i].

Which is called Reductio Ad Iudaeum. Ad nauseam.
Plus fkin ultra!

>>32
Not >>25. As in, I'm not the only one getting tired of you.
Stop playing sock puppets, Hymie. It is well known that the Jews love being actors, pretending they are different persons. You may as well pretend you're a Batman.

you keep dragging Jews into contexts where [i]they don't fkin [b]belong[bi][/i].
Agreed. The Jews dont belong to our countries, that is why we must purge every single Jew.

Jews dont belong to our countries
Nor in our threads. But you still keep dragging them in.

Stop playing sock puppets, Hymie
So then, now you're hallucinating sock-puppets as well as jews.
What drugs are you on exactly?

I was >>25 and I would hope people have the courtesy to consider each post that of a unique poster unless that poster evidences themselves otherwise.  It's only courtesy.

>>35
Shalom! If it stinks like a Jew and acts like a Jew, then what it is?

>>34
Nor in our threads. But you still keep dragging them in.
But your threads were about the Jews from the beginning. Take Open Source for example: both Stallman and Linus are Jewish, so every thread about Open Source is also about the Jews, worse yet - about commie Jews.

>>36
Replies like this are why it is often believe you, whichever one of the people support your position you are, do not even read what it is the other person writes.

>>36
A mirror?

>>37
This is getting really old.