The Jewish Malware Business

Ever heard names like Eugene Kaspersky or Shlomo Kramer? Or maybe you wonder why most of IT "security" companies have such distinctive founders or based directly in Israel, like Tel Aviv based Check Point Software?

So how Jewish virus writers make money on writing malware? Simple! Jews sell antivirus software, which protects user's computers from the viruses, these Jews write. The more malware Jews distribute, the more people will have to buy their antiviruses or pay in other way, being a bonnet nodes, losing a credit card numbers and having to pay ransom to unlock computer.

Salam, Ahmed!

>>2
Shalom, kike!

>Or maybe you wonder why most of IT "security" companies have such distinctive founders or based directly in Israel

Actually, we don't wonder why because we already know most IT companies have nothing to do with Israel. Unless you live in Israel.

Honestly, are you even trying? Guess not.

>>4
most IT companies have nothing to do with Israel.
Shalom! Denial is the first attribute of a true Jew.

Let's take an obvious piece of shit, this site is written in...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHP
Zeev Suraski and Andi Gutmans, two Israeli developers at the Technion IIT...

or a widely used IM (for some reason everyone in Russia uses it)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICQ
Mirabilis was first established in June 1996 by five Israelis: Yair Goldfinger, Sefi Vigiser, Amnon Amir, Arik Vardi, and Arik's father Yossi Vardi...

>>5
Which has nothing to do with the fact you don't know shit about the IT industry. I, however, am a IT certified professional. You don't cite numbers and have no statistics to declare. Pointing out there exist at least one Jewish owned company doesn't even come close to making an implied point.

Seriously, there are millions of companies in this world. You do realize that if a single Jew owns a company, he doesn't own the other million companies as well. You do know that, right? Right? You know?

Try using something other than posting random Jewish names with out any context. It makes you look very ignorant, like Islam's false prophets or your mother's knowledge about who your real father is. :)

>>4
Because Intel and Microsoft have nothing to do with Israel amirite? Denial truly is the first attribute of the jew. Go back to writing more viruses hymie.

>>7
Salam, Ahmed!

>>7
I had no idea that Intel and Microsoft were Jew owned and run by Jews right out of Israel. Sorry fag, I can't deny when you don't even make statements to back up your obviously retarded declarations.

Silly, boy. Are you even trying tonight? Lulz.

So what would happen, if some independent goyim firm release some successful software without Jewish approval? The Jewish antivirus companies can just label it as malware and the goyim will go bankrupt. That already happened several times in Russia, when Kaspersky AV mislabeled innocent shareware software to remove competitors.

>>6
I, however, am a IT certified professional.
Who "certified" you? Microsoft? Do you know that both Steve Balmer and Bill Gates have Jewish ancestry?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates
William Henry "Bill" Gates III is the former CEO and current chairman of Microsoft
Bill Gates is Jewish by DNA: his father is purely Jewish and mother is half-Jewish. Bill Gates has made his scholarship fund off limits to white teenagers. The Gates Millennium Scholarship fund is financed by a $1 Billion endowment Bill Gates made in 1999. The fund explicitly denies eligibility to white students: Students are eligible to be considered for a GMS scholarship if they: Are African American, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian and Pacific Islander American, or Hispanic American. (https://nominations.gmsp.org/GMSP_APP/docs/NomineeForms.pdf)

Gates was refused membership at Augusta Country Club, which was when they still had Gentlemen's agreement not to have any Jews in their fancy club. Key to Microsoft’s success is of course Zionist connections, but also their rude way to blackmail OEM sellers. If OEM seller doesn’t use Microsoft products on all their computers Microsoft threatened OEMs. All Microsoft’s file formats used to be closed source and corporations could get information only by buying that from Microsoft.

It is Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, who keeps the doors open for gay-rights activists. GLEAM is the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) employee resource group at Microsoft. Microsoft was one of the first companies in the world to offer employee benefits to same-sex domestic partners and to include sexual orientation in its corporate policy. Since 1989, Microsoft has supported and sponsored gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender issues.

Just like Stallman, Bill Gates advocates Earth depopulation: "reduce population growth, and everything -- the stability, the environment -- benefits from that." (http://edition.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/02/03/gupta.gates.vaccines.world.health/index.html)

>>11
stuff
And none of this means anything.

I repeat, none of this means anything.

>>12
Shalom!


>>6
Seriously, there are millions of companies in this world.
Exactly! But only Jewish companies are successful, like Microsoft or Google, while millions of their competitors go bankrupt for some interesting reason. It is like on Russian TV: Russia has 140 million goyim population 1 million Jews, but almost all TV personalities are Jewish.

>>12
I repeat...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_repetition

>Bill Gates is Jewish by DNA

TLDR

Your logic points you in 100 different unrelated directions and you don't even try to connect the dots. Have you proven that Bill and Steve ordered malware to be made? Are these companies based in Israel? What do scholarships have to do with malware? What does homosexuality have to do with malware? These fags are typical leftist douche bags, retard. Congratulation on noticing liberals actually exist.

Seriously, are you stupid? Macs were bulletproof until recently. Bill Gates doesn't even run Microsoft anymore and I manage 13000 computers from a single machine that uses free enterprise level ant-virus software from Microsoft. You don't know shit about the IT industry, its politics or its shady underside. Your ignorance of the botnet is juvenile. You don't cite a single thing that would make me believe seriously researched anything. 

I'm asking you to prove your argument rather than spamming unrelated copypasta. Oh, btw...Bill Gates isn't Jewish you stupid retard. Neither of his parents even have Jew blood, period.

>>15
Have you proven that Bill and Steve ordered malware to be made?
I have not assert that. You're imagining something again, Hymie.

Are these companies based in Israel?
To quote Ballmer: "Microsoft is as much an Israeli company as an American company. We intend to continue to invest in Israel." Microsoft tends to downplay its contribution to Israel for fear of an Arab backlash.

Bill Gates doesn't even run Microsoft anymore
Yes. Steve Ballmer now heads Microsoft and Ballmer is no less Jewish than Gates, who still remains a key person at MS.

>>16
>I have not assert that. You're imagining something again, Hymie.

Then I guess you ignored the title of the thread and made a anti-Jew post without any point to be made with respect to this thread. Nice attempt at back-peddling. 

You realize we just caught you in a blatant lie. Bill Gates doesn't even have Jew DNA. Ballmer was just a manager that got lucky and is now destroying Microsoft with his stupidity, Jews DNA or not.

So what was your point again? You realize Ballmer is just a single man, right? If he was half Mexican, would Microsoft be part of a vast Mexican conspiracy? Really, dumbass?   

Microsoft is an international corporation with assets and branches all over the world, including the Middle East and Israel. You like to imply without backing your weak ass faggotry.

You are a disappointment. InB4, jjjjooooooooo! Heh.

>>17
You realize Ballmer is just a single man, right?
Shalom! Officially there are around 5,275,000 practicing Jews in U.S. (I'm sure there much more non-practicing and 1/2 Jews)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population_by_country

Hijacking and plundering Germany in 1919 required just 500,000.

>>17
Bill Gates doesn't even have Jew DNA.
Look at his family photos.

>>19
Salam, Ahmed!

>>19
His physical appearance and the physical appearance of his family wouldn't change whether or not he has Jewish DNA in his family tree (to clarify that statement: "their physical appearances do not magically create a Jewish ancestor that was not there before any of them were born").  If you can't find that, the predecessor, then you're full of hot air.

>>21
Shalom! If a person behaves like a Jew, looks like a Jew and have mostly Jewish friends, then this person surely isnt Jewish. Yay!

>>22
Salam! If a Muslim behaves like a Muslim, lies to kuffar about his sick faith to try to manipulate them (something he's encouraged to do by his shitty book), then this person surely isn't Muslim. Yay!

>>23
Yahweh Akbar!

>>11
Studies have been done to show that there is no link between autism and the MMR vaccine, the science just simply isn't there. Gates is just repeating what is already widely known in the science community. Still doesn't stop idiots from Jenny McCarthy to anti-semite nutcases like yourself from trying, though.

>>25
Shalom!

>>25
Studies have been done to show that your god chosen kind is in fact a genetic garbage full of inbreeding and interracial mixing defects. Antisemites are just repeating what is already widely known in the science community. Still doesn't stop degenerates from commies to zionist nutcases like yourself from trying, though.

Do I have to call Friend Computer down here to sort this mess out?

>>27
Cute. Does your mother know that you're using the Internet unsupervised?

Steve Ballmer
DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS

>>29
Does your yiddishe momme know what ethnicity was your dad?

>>30
Yes. When kikes try to look like funny showmen or comedians, they end up looking like a banal degenerates. A good example would be Yevgeny Petrosyan, who annoyed whole Russia with his retarded shows, shown in forced manner on all TV channels. Jews have no talent.

Kill all kikes, plain and simple

>>33
An eye for an eye makes the world blind.  If you intend to force the same result you claim they wish against us, and expect their response in kind, you'll find that this side is woefully uncoordinated.

>>34
Yeah, nothing that your systematic subversion and subjugation enabled by their generations spinstrel thievery hasn't made sure of, right? For a people who supposedly believe in divine justice, you sure do exercise a lot of hubris, have to wonder what they really do believe. Oh that's right they think they own everything and everyone, and that they're god's favored cocksuckers.

We'll see how that works out for them in the end.

>>35
Once again, you think everyone who disagrees with you is Jewish (what's the matter?  I was starting to like being called an idiot over the internet).  What I'm pointing out is that you're doing a poor job of convincing people of your position and that's already on top of a major public opinion disadvantage.  I don't want you to stop but I want you to rethink your argument and come up with better ones, ones that actually work to convince people.

>>36
Actually, I take back my own first supposition, on account that, re-reading your post, I really don't know who you are talking about.  You refer to "me" and "their" in separate but ambiguous accusations that seem to wrap together.  It's difficult to tell which belongs to which.

I'll happily reclaim my idiot label in your eyes.

>>34
There are just a few million kikes. No one will miss their demise.

>>38
We're still missing the last "6 million."  And, if other threads are correct, the partially-Jewish must go too and that cuts into the world population as a whole.

The point stands: organization between different anti-Semitic groups is virtually nonexistent and neither the largest nor the smallest camp makes any progress in their movement.  Public image is poor.  I'll buy that Russia sucks, whether or not because of its Jewish denizens, but the country's sucked for a long long time anyway so it's hard to tell without bias.  When larger groups form, still nothing happens; your position appears to foster no progress save for lone wild cards who act out of some other frustration, and sometimes have to be informally adopted just to keep up image.  From the perspective of an outsider, there's nothing but constant recruitment efforts and empty rallying.

>>39
I doubt there is any kind of public image. Most people just dont care and dont see how the Jews affect them in global. You may as well tell them that "600 millions Jew died!", and they will be "Yeah, sad story, and my grandma too died from cancer last year..."

But every one is a potential antisemite, especially if one learns that we still dont have a cure from cancer just because the Jews rise mediocrity among medical scientists, in effect slowing down medical advances.

And have we forgot the Dark Ages, due to Jewish Christianity, when no scientific advances were made at all?

>>40
And have we forgot the Dark Ages, due to Jewish Christianity, when no scientific advances were made at all?
... I keep forgetting there are still faulty education systems that teach people to call that period of time the "Dark Ages," where "nothing of any significance happened."  It's a legitimate perspective, especially since it's followed by the Renaissance, considered the apex of cultural enlightenment in Europe, but it isn't like the world just stopped doing things or making any kind of progress because "it's the Middle Ages."  The Middle Ages is like "the next iPhone" or "the next iPad;" things improved, but not in an earth-shattering way.  Feudalism wasn't even a new thing back then, just a more established thing, but history lessons eschew more interesting, but more obscure, topics for that time period.

we still dont have a cure from cancer just because the Jews rise mediocrity among medical scientists
If it helps you sleep at night.

Jewish Christianity
The word is "Judeochristianity."  If you include Muslims, it's "Abrahamic religions."

>>41
It's a legitimate perspective, especially since it's followed by the Renaissance
It followed by Renaissance because:
1. Christianity was dead end - a cattle-pen.
2. Church influence weakened and the cattle ran away from its pen into all directions, including the ones popular before Christianity.

>>42
Actually, a lot of what would evolve into the philosophy of the Renaissance existed during the Medieval period.  The Roman/Grecian philosophers and great thinkers were already being referenced even before the end of the Western Roman Empire, and while not plentiful, many late Medieval thinkers led the way for the scientific and intellectual achievements of the later period.  The real problem was distribution of ideas; the lingering unrealized "ubiquity of romantic languages" did not allow good information distribution and no one actually performed formal writing work asides from scholars and monks.  Access to information was limited by physical supply and work required to access those sources in "safe" ways, "safe" meaning a way in which the information was not damaged.  It was time consuming to copy information.

That's why the Gutenberg printing press was so powerful; it succeeded the ageless scribe, who laboriously copied books by hand, and the oral traditionalist who was short of breath even long before then.  It was the first rung on a ladder of distributing information without monumental effort required.

>>43
Then one may ask, why printing press wasnt invented earlier (printing isnt a rocket science) and the Church in general was against literacy.

>>44
In that case, why didn't the Romans know how to use saltpeter? or the Egyptians not knowing about steam-powered elevators (I recall reading something about the Egyptians vaguely knowing how to use steam, but only for gimmicky pizzazz)? or why it took until them (the Ancent Egyptians, I forget which dynasty) to formalize the concept of an alphabet on that side of Europe (the Chinese, in the Far East)?

And, if they did have it, they obviously didn't know how to make good use of it and, like the Parthian Battery or the Antikythera mechanism, it was just a gimmicky one-off that was forgotten.

>>45
Excuse my improper location-indicating: that was supposed to be "Eurasia," not just "Europe."

>>45
Romans had a writing system, so a fast replication of texts was just a matter of creating a font then applying it to any media.

>>47
Egyptians came first.  Even so, neither they nor the Romans thought to do that; no one did until Gutenberg came along.  I don't even recall a hypothesis - "would it not be great if ..." - where someone, anyone, ever considered the possibility of a machine that could replicate textual information in that specific manner to increase public access.

There's also the possibility that the media available media didn't lend itself to this kind of treatment.  Papyrus and parchment were easy to be spoil by their environment, and the former was notoriously brittle.  The earliest product as useful and durable as our paper wasn't formally prolific in Europe until the 13th century, the product and process having migrated westward from China (who first created it) very slowly.

>>48
Egyptians had clay tablets and the clay can easily be mold by a form with a font.