The government dishes out the death penalty all the time but when a community comes together to lynch a criminal everyone throws a hissy fit.
I thought this was supposed to be a democracy.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-18 9:26
>>1 I thought this was supposed to be a democracy.
That is a "direct democracy", while you have "representative democracy", where you are being "represented" by some Jew, who elected himself through voting fraud.
The Jews can easily organize voting fraud due to few factors:
1. they have most of the world capital and cay buy anyone. in fact, they print the world's single currency.
2. in higher government/financial circles there are only Jewish persons, so they have 99.99% loyalty to Jewish cause
3. you are being brainwashed that you vote really means something, while in reality the voting is just a big TV show, like wrestling.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-18 10:33
>>1
Come back after some slick demagogue gets the crowd to make you pay for someone else's crime.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-20 18:05
>>3
No one ever got lynched but niggers. Which was entertaining for the taxpayers and kept the niggers from indulging their genetically encoded compulsion to rob, rape, and murder Whitey.
>2012
>anthropomorphizing niggers
ISHYGDDT
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-20 18:18
>>4
During middle ages they also lynched the Jews, burning some Jewish whore at the stake. In Russia beating a kike was a kind of national sport. Pogroms are too a form of lynching.
>>4 No one ever got lynched but niggers
Not even in the Wild West?
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-05 16:42
I don't always agree with anarchists but when I do it usually revolves around pitchforks, flaming torches, angry mobs and nooses.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-09 22:40
█████████░░░░░░░░▒███████
███████░░░░░░░░░░░░▒█████
█████▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██
███████░░░█████▓░░░░░░░▒█
████░░░█░░█░░░▓▓░░░░░░░░█
████▄▄▄▒░░▒▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░█
███░░▄░░░▄░░░░░░░░░░░░▒██
███░░▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░████
███░░█▀▀▀█░░░░▒▒░░░░██░██
███░░█▄▄▄█░█▒▒█░░░░▒█▒███
████░░░░░░░███▒█░█▓▓▓████
█████░░░░░███▒████░░░████
██████▒▒▒██░█░░██░░░░████
███░░████▒█░█░█▒█░░░░████
███░░█░▒█░█░█░███░░░░░▒██
███▒░█▒██░█░█░▓▒█▓░░░░░░░
███▒░████░█░░░░░██░░░░░░░
██░░░░██░░░░▓░▒▒▒▓░░░░░░░
██░░░░██░░░░▒░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░▒
██░░░░█▓░░░░░░░░▒████████
██░░░░▓▒░░░░░░░░░████████
██░░░░▓▒░░░░░░░░█████████
▒░░░░░░█░░░░░░░████Murder is bad and wrong
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-11 13:13
>>8
So a mad axeman is about to murder 20 people and you wouldn't murder the axeman.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-11 17:14
For God's sake, let us sit upon the ground
And tell sad stories of the retard called SFBE of faggots.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-11 18:08
>>9
I am a big fan of bondage, molestation and keeping them trapped in my basement where they beg for death. Actually giving it to them is far too merciful. What are you, some sort of faggot? You even made it clear that the potential victim hasn't even killed anyone that I know yet. All the more reason to rustle their "Jimmies" until they cum all over the place.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-12 1:05
>>9
Dont be such a Naiz. Axeman is protected by "minority" rights. You cant just lynch a member of endangered minority, like mad axemans. Besides, degenerates, downs, schizophrenics, psychopaths and mad axemans have unique genetics, enriching Earth's biological diversity.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-12 18:58
I haven't ever read so much horseshit in so little space, congratulations... I guess.
>>13 >>14
Can either of you logically explain how OP is wrong?
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-16 10:19
Because >>13,14 is Jewish, so lynching will hurt him. Do you want him advocate his own murder? Heh, goyim are stupid these days...
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-16 10:59
>>1
Well, you're dead wrong. The US was never a democracy, it was founded as a constitutional republic. Thus every law in and between the counties answer before It.
>>19
Semantics and hair splitting. All modern Western democracies have a rule of law of some sort, either civil law for the countries of continental Europe or common law for the English-language countries. Whether they're republics or monarchies. I find it funny that some of the countries that have ruling monarchs seem to be somewhat more democratic in practice than the republican system of the US. I mean the US can't even hold a national referendum for fuck's sake.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-19 11:18
>>20
Just out of interest. How would you define that thing which we all know is wrong with OP's post? It's good to get a strict definition of things.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-19 12:59
On the face of it, lynchings do look democratic enough; some slick demagogue convinces people that you need to die, usually to pay for an unsolved murder case or something. Object all you want, but the people have voted.
The actual problem is that those people haven't been given much of a trial-worthy case. More often than not, the demagogue in question has been feeding the crowd some emotional BS, filled with half-truths or even outright lies. And the emotional frenzy he's whipped up, makes it outright dangerous to start poking holes in his …logic.
Much better, then, the controlled and orderly forms that a courtroom presents¹. There people can demand evidence with something like impunity, and it is now up to the demagogue in question to actually supply a case based on logic, reasoning – and, well, evidence. Actually prove that you really did what he says you did, have logic and reasoning dictate what fate you really deserve.
Greatly reduces¹ those hideous miscarriages of justice, that lynchings actually invite by their very essence.
¹ On paper.
Doesn't really take the risk away completely, just reduces them significantly. But there's still those cases where some dickhead puts his prestige and authority into making it a show trial. Which is, among other things, why we need constraints on who gets to conduct cases. Nobody who just simply personally hates you, nobody who loves your money/woman/job/whatever and needs you gone, nobody that needs to be seen as «not soft on crime» for some upcoming election, etc.
And, obviously no MAFIAA members that will not make products worthy of your money, now that they see a way to make more money through protection-money schemes like LawsuiTerrorism.
Tl;dr: Court-rooms are, in theory, much safer for the innocent than are lynchings. That's been eroded away by show-trials over the centuries, but that's actually somewhat of an easier problem to address.
And, hopefully, fix.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-19 13:52
>>23 The actual problem is that those people haven't been given much of a trial-worthy case. More often than not, the demagogue in question has been feeding the crowd some emotional BS, filled with half-truths or even outright lies. And the emotional frenzy he's whipped up, makes it outright dangerous to start poking holes in his …logic.
Lets take the case of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Frank
People in general hate the Jews and some anti-semite pointed Leo's ethnicity (Jews are well known for their pedophilia and ritual killings), so crowd lynched him . Everyone is happy and the highly-paid position of this Jews was freed for a goyim. I.e. by lynching society extorted a harmful foreign element.
Other example are Islamic countries where crowd lynches some whore or homosexual and by that increasing society moral.
If people want to lynch a homosexual or a nigger, why stopping them?
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-19 13:55
>>24
Also note how cute is Mary Phagan, and how ugly and disfigured is this kike Leo Frank. By killing him Americans cleansed their genetic pool, so Leo havent produced anyugly offsprings.
>>28 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loli Can refer to the art, or the subjects, or be slang for a girl who is perceived as fitting the look or mannerisms.
I can't believe you've never heard of what a "loli" is, especially considering that the book Lolita was written by a Russian. How long have you been on this site?
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-20 8:47
>>27
And nobody wants your money, your job, your woman, your house, anything at all?
And no ethnicities around you have any problem whatsoever with you? No religious bigots anywhere?
And you've not even found out about some high-level crimes that need to come out?
Nobody that just plain simply wants you to shut up?
Then worry about being in the wrong place at the wrong time. When a lynch-mob is particularly butthurt and needs to vent some frustration, they don't necessarily care too much about individual guilt.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-20 9:51
>>30 And nobody wants your money, your job, your woman, your house, anything at all?
I'm an average John Smith, with average wife, living in average house, guarded by an average dog.
And no ethnicities around you have any problem whatsoever with you? No religious bigots anywhere?
I'm a member of ethnic majority.
Nobody that just plain simply wants you to shut up?
Jews would probably want, because I call to lynch all Jews and nationalize Jewish property. I.e. take Jewish property and sell to goyim at low prices.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-20 12:08
>>29
Who said 4chan must be pedo central? I for one am glad moot is purging you faggots from all the boards.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-20 12:32
>>31
Like I said, worry then about being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The more generally butthurt the lynch-mob, the less they tend to care about individual guilt.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-20 12:32
>>29 Lolita was written by a Russian.
Well Nabokov looks like an authentic Slav, but thanks to him and gesheftmacher-kikes Russia and Ukraine now look like a pedophile heaven and most CP comes from Russia :(
>>32 Who said 4chan must be pedo central?
Where did I ever mention that in >>29 ? I for one am glad moot is purging you faggots from all the boards.
Well I don't care what happens to them either. Do you realize that non-pedos also use the terminology, yes?