Republifags Support CISPA

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll192.xml

Republican
206 Yes
28 No

Democratic
42 Yes
140 No


How the fuck do you tards still get away with calling yourselves the "small government" party?

Because all of their members are tardballs

Because republicans aren't conservatives, they're basically all neo-cons bar a handful.

That was definitely surprising since the origin of the bill was only "mixed" for some time.  I'm not going to rule out the possibility this somehow pivoted into an "oppose the President's position" moment, but it's still disappointing.

Incidentally, I've only read through SOPA, but not CISPA.  Is anything but the title different between the two?

>>3

Because republicans aren't conservatives, they're basically all neo-cons bar a handful.
What the fuck happened to the Tea Party? Are there really only 28 Tea Partiers in the House? Or... could it be that they're just full of shit? Anyway whether or not they're full blown card toting Teabaggers is irrelevant. I can guaranfuckingtee you that a large chuck of those 206 were voted in by people who identify as libertarian and campaigned on the idea of "reducing government."
 
>>4

Is anything but the title different between the two?
Yes. CISPA is worse from what I've read. All SOPA would do is basically make it easier to shut down websites suspected of intellectual property theft. CISPA would allow the federal government to force websites to share data with them if it suspected a "cyber threat," something more loosely defined than "terrorist." Federal government could get your web history, email, etc. if you suspects you of being a criminal. True story.

>>5
The Tea Party is full of fail because it was an available bandwagon for politicians to jump on who literally have no idea how to follow through once they were in. It had some momentum but when the members can't drive it because they're more interested in party politics than political philosophy then it will go no where.

>What the fuck happened to the Tea Party? Are there really only 28 Tea Partiers in the House?

They got demonized my the media and libfags as insane terrorists and baby killers.

Enjoy you massive government agenda bros.

>>7
So it's liberals' fault that the Tea Party didn't kill a bill that expands the power of the federal government? On second thought, you're actually right. Democrats were against it so naturally the Teafags supported it. They're not the "small government" party. They're the "oppose Obama and the democrats no matter what it is" party.

>>8
Nice straw man you got there.

>>9
How so? Do you even know what a straw man argument is? The Tea Party doesn't give a shit about reducing government unless Democrats are in power. I've provided a concrete example of how that's their position. Nothing straw man about it. http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/04/27/cispa-passes-the-house-with-tea-party-support/

>>10
I do but clearly you have no idea.

You addressed >>7 while substituted his statement for something completely different you invented because it was easy to attack. You used a logical fallacy, good job.

>>11
What the fuck are you on? Let's review. My "made up," "substituted" position:

So it's liberals' fault that the Tea Party didn't kill a bill that expands the power of the federal government?
That's exactly what >>7 implied. I asked a straightforward question: why didn't the Tea Party (or Republicans voted in by Tea Partiers) oppose this bill? His response was: they got demonized by the liberal media. Nothing more. If he had a different point, he should have made it.

I'm a Republican and this shit is fucking ridic. I can't stand these fucks in office sometimes.

>>12
>That's exactly what >>7 implied.
No, it wasn't, plain and simple.

>>14
Yes it was. Being a faggot about it isn't helping your case.

>>14
>arguing over nothing