Can you become wealthy?

Without exploiting your fellow man and ripping them off? Is it possible to become rich without being ethically corrupt?

Yes. Start producing things that people demand and are willing to pay for. Then sustain that until your business grows large enough to employ workers.

It's called investment.

The question should be reversed. The fact that someone needs to ask this question shows how ignorant people can be about wealth creation and industry over the last 100 years.

bUy g0lD

>>2
As soon as you succeed, the Jews will take over your business. Just like Microsoft disposed of all competitors. There are many ways: price dumping, bureaucracy, racket or just a death in an accident. And to start with, a good share of your business would be already owned by Jewish investors/debtors, so taking you out would be just a question of time.

>>5
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-competitive_practices
Here is how Jews run their businesses, so that goyim wont get any power.

>>5-6
Funny, Henry Ford's company held some pretty anti-competitive practices and he wasn't very fond of Jews himself. A great anti-semitic warrior like Ford being ruthless in business!? zOMG! No wai!

>>2
By paying workers less than the value they make, are you ripping off your fellow man?

>>8
I'm not forcing them to sign a work contract with me. We negotiate the conditions and if they find that what I'm offering isn't enough, they seek employment elsewhere.

There's also no set value for labour. It's all in how much a person is willing to work for.

>>9
There's also no set value for labour. It's all in how much a person is willing to work for.
It's all about how you outsource work to chinese niggers, when your home population refuse to work in harsh conditions for a few bucks.

>>10
Not my fault they can't compete. Plus, they're the ones that voted for higher minimum wages.

Imagine a lake bed with a shallow layer of water on it. When it cracks, water flows from the higher levels to the lower ones. Business works the same way. If conditions aren't profitable in one location, it will flow to a location where conditions are profitable.

>>11
Why can businesses move their money around, but people are not allowed to move themselves around?

Any business that moves its workforce to china is engaging in slavery so that the owners can steal more money.

>>12
Who says you're not allowed? It's just that most countries allow citizenship to foreigners who will contribute, namely businessmen.

slavery
steal more money

How is employing people slavery and theft again?

>>13
How is employing people slavery and theft again?
By employing rightless foreigners or using free economic zones, where workers have no more rights than slaves.

>>14
Nobody is forcing those third worlders to work for me. I offer, they take it or leave it. If they take it, they sign a legitimate work contract in where they are obligated to work and I am obligated to pay them a set sum of money as per mutually agreed upon conditions. And let's not forget that people in the third world are better off working for a foreign company than trying to live off the land. In India, for example, poverty was cut in half thanks to western investment into the economy. Foreign business has brought wealth which didn't exist there, allowing a middle class to form.

What you're advocating is that all foreign businesses pack up and leave the third world so all of these so-called "slaves" can go back to starving because some protectionist idiot decided to kick out their employers.

>>15
Nobody is forcing those third worlders to work for me.
Their government is. Consider modern Israel, which collaborates with corrupt post-USSR governments to sell Slavic women as whores. Government Jews can easily cut off slave trade, but they have all reason not to - it removes poor women from economy and provides bribes from Israeli mafia.

>>15
What you're advocating is that all foreign businesses pack up and leave the third world so all of these so-called "slaves" can go back to starving because some protectionist idiot decided to kick out their employers.
I'm advocating these so-called "slaves" to develop their own economy and capital, which will join the concurrency. But the Jews wont allow that - they dont want concurrents.

>>16
Human trafficking isn't what I would call business outsourcing.

>>18
principles are the same.

>>19
Except one (business) is productive and the other (human trafficking) is detrimental to society.

If you view 'becoming Rich' as having more money/wealth/resources than normal... then YES, you must exploit, rip-off, and use unethical means to gain that wealth...

If you view 'becoming Rich' as having more experience, more people to rely on, and a better standard of living at all... then NO.  Functioning inside of the economic system (assuming the system wasn't corrupted by people functioning outside the system) you can become enriched with life and happiness without the need for simple monetary things.  It's one of the reasons Socialism works on paper.

But until every person in the system can be trusted to play by the rules of the system, then following the rules leads to becoming exploited... The Prisoner's Dilemma is a good example of how playing nice can make you lose out in the long run.

>>20
Except one (business) is productive
How selling your own people into slavery is in any way "productive"?

(human trafficking) is detrimental to society.
Israeli man gets cheap goyim whores. This stimulates Jewish economy. Liberalism at its best!

No.  Not if being “wealthy” means you hoard disproportionately more resource than your fellow-humans.

The Bible sums it up: the likelihood of a “rich” man going to Haven is the same as a camel passing through an eye of a needle. In other words, you cannot be rich and ethical at the same time.

Unfortunately, the evolution rewards hoarding of resources, which is why so many try to do it even though, by definition, only few can succeed in it.

You can increase the chances of you becoming wealthy, and in doing so very likely increase your wealth somewhat.

The problem is that after people get hyped up to change their lives and improve things they only put in the effort for a few months before losing their integrity and going back to their old way of doing things. If they are living in poverty they may succeed in keeping themselves just out of poverty but don't do much after that.