Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Putin: US ... needs vassals, not allies

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-27 21:41

"The U.S. “wants to control everything” and takes decisions unilaterally on key questions, Putin said on a campaign stop yesterday in the Siberian city of Tomsk, 3,100 kilometers (1,900 miles) east of Moscow. “Sometimes I get the impression the U.S. doesn’t need allies, it needs vassals.”"

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-25/putin-says-u-s-seeks-vassals-not-allies-as-campaign-heats-up.html

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-27 22:36

And? Your point is?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-28 4:09

Hahaha! Leave it to Emperor Putin to adopt a leftist position. Certainly such double standards aren't beyond him.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-28 13:48

>>3
Quod licet iovi, non licet bovi

World domination sounds ok, when it is being achieved by some sort of Empire of Evil. For a Republic of Good, Freedom and Democracy - such behavior isn't appropriate.
Therefore, US should either change its behavior or admit that it has turned evil and imperialistic.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-28 14:14

>>4
Not before the Russian Federation admits its atrocities in Chechnya, subversion of democracy in Ukraine, covert operations in Kyrgyzstan, war for oil in Georgia and its ownership of puppet regimes in various CIS countries.

Mr. Putin should look at his own puddle of blood before criticizing others for their puddle of blood.

"Quid autem vides festucam in oculo fratris tui et trabem in oculo tuo non vides" - Matthaeus 7:3

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-29 22:21

>>5

Not before U$A pays back victims of all wars it started since the fifties.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-31 3:49

>>6
It already did. The USA is one of the biggest foreign aid contributors in the world and also provides free defence for half the world.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-31 14:59

>>7
More like, we all need defence from the USA

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-31 22:59

>>7
Foreign "aid" is a method of taking over other countries, putting them into debt that they don't need.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confessions_of_an_Economic_Hit_Man

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-01 5:14

>>9
What's next, you're gonna throw Alex Jones at me?

Also, funny how you didn't read a big segment of the article about the book's criticism.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-01 21:49

>>10

Of course I did, otherwise I would not be posting a link to a Wikipedia article, but something biased instead.

I just don't remember USAID helping anyone nor I remember IMF helping any country to get out of crisis. Not only these institutions not needed, they are harmful.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-02 17:54

>>9
>implying that anyone has any serious expectations of getting one cent back in return for any foreign aid gifts, ever
>implying that foreign aid is anything but gifts and grants

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-02 18:25

>>11
>I just don't remember USAID helping anyone
Are you stupid? How about the countries who buy things like medicine with aid money? Have they not been helped or do you need to physically see it in person?

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-03 5:25

>>13
That help only keeps the population grow beyond the capabilities of country to feed them, so that the country spends all moneys on buying food from abroad, therefore continueing staying a poor undeveloped shithole with no chance to ever break that damnable circle.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-03 6:22

>>14
So what you're saying is that aid money for things like vaccinations, basic medicine, water pumps, food and schools are designed to keep third world countries down. And you think these countries would be better off without all of these things?

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-03 14:06

>>15
Well, yes. The aid money are meant to be spent on immediately satisfying the basic needs of people (to buy food, medicine, etc.), while it should be spent on developing infrastucture, building your own farms and factories. You need deal with the cause of problem first, not constantly fight with the consequences of it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-03 19:11

>>16
Of course you do but how are you supposed to even think about improving infrastructure when infant mortality rates are ridiculously high and average life expectancy is nothing?

Who is more likely to build a farm? Someone starving, half-dead with malaria or someone without? The answer is obvious.

Long term needs need to be addressed but not by completely ignoring the short term needs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-14 16:55

>>16
it should be spent on developing infrastucture, building your own farms and factories.
Why should U.S. care about economy of a 3rd world country?

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-14 16:58

>>17
Of course you do but how are you supposed to even think about improving infrastructure when infant mortality rates are ridiculously high and average life expectancy is nothing?
If mortality is so high, then why do they have overpopulation? Maybe mortality should be increased?

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-14 18:45

>>19
>If mortality is so high, then why do they have overpopulation?
But it's not, that's the point. Read the thread.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-15 9:01

­

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-15 14:08

>>18
Why should U.S. care about a 3rd world country at all?

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-15 14:28

>>22
Every country has resources or can develop into a concurrent entity. Corporations have interest in establishing monopoly on everything: culture, media, science, technology -- everything should be controlled by U.S. or other loyal entity.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-17 4:28

this coming from a kbg turned president in charge of the largest mafia in the world.

fuck russia. fuck the red mafia. too corrupt. cant even live by the old code of thieves.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-22 21:25

Putin for the win, Obama and Republicans to prison!
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -