Bacha Bazi Boys VIDEO

Bacha Bazi Boys VIDEO – Afghanistan’s “Dancing Boys” & How Muslims Pimp Young Boys for Gang Rape

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/20825/must-watch-the-bacha-bazi-boys-video-on-afghanistans-dancing-boys-how-muslims-pimp-young-boys-for-gang-rape/

For years, I’ve repeatedly written about the myth of “Islamic modesty.” It’s bunk, but we somehow assign an exoticism and strange respect for devout Muslims who actually engage in some of the worst sexual, immodest practices, including using young boys as sex slaves all over the Islamic world (something I’ve also written about).  And our hand-picked Prime Minister, Afghanistan’s Hamid Karzai, actually allows this pimping and human trafficking of poor, young boys to devout Muslims to gang rape them.  And that’s after they make the boys wear women’s clothing and dance for them.  It’s truly disgusting.  If you saw the movie or read the book, “The Kite Runner” (read my review), you are probably familiar with the practice.

>For years, I’ve repeatedly written about the myth of “Christian modesty.” It’s bunk, but we somehow assign an exoticism and strange respect for devout Christians who actually engage in some of the worst sexual, immodest practices, including using young boys as sex slaves all over the Christian world (something I’ve also written about).
Fix'd for accuracy.

My friends in the army told me about this sort of shit. Muslims consider gay to only be between adults. Fucking kids is the same as fucking cattle. It's shameful but not illegal.

>>3
It's worse than you think.

It's shameful but not illegal.
For once, I wish I were a muslim.

>>5
If the boy has a beard, you're dead meat. Otherwise, it's all good. I remember reading a report a while back about how there are as many homosexuals in the middle east as there are anywhere else. However, because homosexuality is illegal and punishable by death, this means they have to fuck young boys or else.

If you ever visit a Muslim nation, you'll notice odd tendencies of men wearing perfume and referring to other men as being beautiful. You'll see them talking about it even in English speaking Islamic forums. This isn't really gay to them. However, gays still need an outlet so many become terrorists to hide the shame. This is because you can still get 72 male virgins if you die during jihad.

>>6
So there's no "second option" where Mr.Upstairs removes one's gayness and _then_ supplies 72 female virgins?

>>7
Allah provides 72 virgins of either sex if you can get into heaven. What you do is up to you.

I get the impression that 99% of Muslim women don't go to heaven according the Islamic religion. Islamic culture looks down on women as being inferior to men both spiritually and in mental capacity.

>>8
Last I heard, a good wife's reward would be a premium seat for watching her husband doing 72 other women. And that's supposed to be her paradise…

Islam is kind of a fucked up religion if you're female.

Christianity is kind of a fucked up religion if you're female.

>>11
Yeah, they don't stone you and you can leave the religion any time you want. Plus, no honor killings. Weird!

>>12
Like nobody's ever done that shit in Christianity. The only difference between the two is that there are more Muslims that still follow their holy text to the letter. Both religions are garbage and there is no fundamental difference.

>>12
Who's been spending the last three or four decades ragging on women's liberty activists for the "feminazi" idea of women being men's equals?
Who were the suffragettes up against some hundred years ago just so as to get to vote as citizens in a democracy?

Christianity and Islam both spring from Judaism. You don't have to be female for all of those religions to be fucked-up. It just helps.

>Both religions are garbage and there is no fundamental difference.

Except for the fact Muslim kill you for no reason and Christfags want to give you free bibles. Atheistfags murder people for ideological reasons. Gay fags rape babies and spread AIDS.

Humans in general are murderous assholes regardless of these religious and political differences. Muslims are just plain bad apples.

>>14
>Who's been spending the last three or four decades ragging on women's liberty activists

No one really. Feminazis are funny little trolls but Anonymous still likes to put them in their place. Good times man.

>>15
Muslims have reasons for killing. They're wrong but they still have reasons. Mainly they want Israel destroyed and US troops out of their holy land. But Christians have a rich history of killing in the name of their religion too. Way to skip over that!

>>16

Anonymous is mostly 14 year old boys.
Fixed.

>Way to skip over that!
Kinda like the way Christians grew out of that phase unlike the average Muslim today?

It's 2011. I hope you see the problem in your logic. Lets simply ignore what godless communist have done as well.

>>17
Hmmm...I can't visit a Muslim holy city without being executed. Muslims can go to the Vatican and piss on it. You can't criticize Islam publicly without getting murdered by Muslims. You can shit on the bible in front of a Church and no one will do anything. Muslims can burn down churches, abuse women, stone women, execute gays, and openly discriminate against and persecute people of different religious beliefs legally in the present day.

Strangely, you seem critical of the one group who won't raise a hand against you while defending the group that will fucking kill you.

Strange logic.

defending the group that will fucking kill you

Perhaps you missed it when I said this:
Both religions are garbage and there is no fundamental difference.

As for your other examples, those are all just vague generalizations. I'm sure I can find plenty of Christian churches where you wouldn't dare shit on a bible.

I concede that there are more extremist Muslims than extremist Christians. And that yes, they are by and large more dangerous right now. But like I said, there is no fundamental difference between the two. The bible is full of intolerance and misogyny just like the Koran. It's just that there are more Muslims who follow their text strictly. Most Christians don't even bother to actually read the whole bible. And the ones that do gloss over the nasty parts with apologist horseshit like "oh, you're taking it out of context" or "there are many interpretations." Of course there are plenty of (probably the majority actually) Muslims who do the same.

Islam started as a monster, then they calmed down. And then us westerners came and started fucking shit up for them. Now they mad.

Islam is a monster now. One that we, the western world, have created in our image. The sooner we realise this, and the implications of it, the sooner we can start actually fixing it.

>>17
Double standards. If every country knew the truth behind it's history they'd all feel ashamed and guilty, it's not good enough that "the west" is faulted, muslims must be criticized also.

You are the racist here, you probably don't feel that way because culturally you've been psychologically conditioned to have a preconceived notion of what a racist looks like and says, logically though you are racist.

>>22

muslims must be criticized also
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU RETARDS?!! I've said numerous times now that Islam is shit also. There is no double standard. How about you read the whole thread before you start making shit up about me!

>>23
Well, 15 said "yadda yadda muslims are evil", you said "no no, christians were just as bad" so I said "so? everyone was worse in the past", I said that to illustrate the irrelevance of the fact that christians were once as bad as muslims to help you get the point. Maybe I'll just directly state it then...

There are currently proportionately less bad christians than bad muslims, for instance South America is strongly catholic yet it is also very religiously tolerant, jews, hindus, buddhists, you can be whatever there, no one cares, there is virtually no religious violence there and the governments are democratic even if they suffer from corruption, South America is also at a similar level of economic and human development which mostly factors out environmental causes for the differences in criminality between the 2 populations.

Can you at least admit that objectively there is something wrong with predominately Islamic cultures?

If a scientists says "African Americans are at risk for heart disease, I believe we should factor this in to benefit African American communities" and Jevontai says "OMG YOU'RE RACIST ALL HUMANS ARE EQUAL", Jevontai is the being racist because "racist" doesn't mean thinking races (or cultures) are different, it means having an illogical bias for or against a race.

Jevontai is right and you are wrong, >>24.  The propaganda on the Jewtube is constantly telling us "race does not exist," "race is a social construct."  If this is so, no one is allowed to reference the concept, whether it is supposedly for the benefit of niggers or not.

>>21
Not really. Muslims have slowly been getting more Islamic for the last 14 centuries. There was a time that they still had half a brain, a sense of independent culture and yet still contributed something to the world. Over time, nations that were infected with Islam lost their uniqueness and became the Islamic shitholes. Every single nation that was taken over by Muslims turned into dark-age shitholes regardless of who they interacted with.

There are 57 Muslim nations. They are all fucking stuck in the dark ages. This is what happens when you let a highly political death cult spread like a cancer. These guys are religious Nazis. Enjoy having to suck their dicks for the next 2000 years.

>>24
Strawman arguing at its finest. I will readily admit that there are currently more Islamic than Christian terrorists. That doesn't mean that they're not fundamentally the same thing though. Read your bible. It's the same shit as the Koran. And for the record, it's not just the past I'm referring to. There are still extremist Christians. Perverted fundamentalists who treat their women like shit just like it says to in the bible.

>>27
So what is the significance of the fact that Muslim countries produce more terrorists? What is the inherent difference? I'm sure a muslim who emigrates to Brazil will likely adopt religious pluralism and will be less likely to become an extremist. I would assume the difference is more due to Islamic culture, whatever minor differences there are between these religions is actually not the point here.

>>28
Religious fundamentalism. It's more common in Islam. My hypothesis is that the Christian bible makes less sense when taken word for word than the Koran. The Koran was written after the bible and is, in some ways, based on it. Its writers were able to learn from the bible writers' mistakes.

It's kind of ironic actually. The Christian bible is more batshit crazy. Therefore less people follow it strictly. Therefore Islam appears to be the more retarded of the two when that's not the case.

>I'm sure a muslim who emigrates to Brazil will likely adopt religious pluralism and will be less likely to become an extremist.

No. Muslims are like Jews in that fashion. They don't change their culture when they move. Except Muslims expect you to change your culture to appease them. I recall that there was a bombing on a synagogue in South America by Muslim in South America years ago. SA Jews don't even support Israel.

Historically, once Muslims start hitting about 20% of the population, they start with the "You insulted my religion infidel!" and go into repeating phases of terrorism until they control the nation. Then they oppress the fuck out of everyone and build their mosques on other peoples holy sites. Then that place becomes a shithole and they migrate to the next nation.