>Minus suspected fakes, then Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama likely fell short of the number of signatures needed to appear on the 2008 Indiana primary ballot, and it's possible his opponent, Hillary Clinton, did as well, according to information obtained by The Tribune as part of an investigation into suspected ballot petition fraud.
>Dozens of people whose signatures appear on the Clinton petition have told The Tribune they did not sign the document, and Erich Speckin, a forensic document analyst hired by the paper and Howey Politics identified at least 19 suspected fake Obama petition pages.
So are the 2008 elections and every law he passed since invalid now?
It just won't, even if that story is true, which it probably isn't .
Asides from which, candidate primaries are simply a party initiative. There is no constitutional requirement that a person needs to win a primary of any sort to stand for and have votes cast for them as president.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-15 1:28
>>1
Sounds like business as usual for the democrats. Just look at how Rahm operates.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-16 10:16
>>5
It's the Chicago way. WOOP WOOP HOPE AND CHANGE, WOOP WOOP YES WE CAN
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-17 12:43
Further proof of bias by the liberal jewsmedia. Someone failed to pay their bribes on time and they put Rod Blagojewich on trial for selling Obama's congressional seat.
But no one in the jewsmedia is going to ask Obama what he paid for the seat in the first place. No one dares ask that question, just like no one will stand up and demand to see the Kenyan's real original birth certificate. You couldn't get a passport, much less a Top Secret clearance with the documentation and history the Kenyan has produced so far, and in fact his known association with Odinga Obama, his cousin, who is a Maoist terrorist leader attempting to overthrow the government of Kenya by force (we won't even get into his lifelong friendship with Weather Underground terrorist William Ayres) would seem to preclude this.
There's a Pulitzer Prize waiting for the crusading reporter who'll give us the truth about the Kenyan. But don't hold your breath. You know who owns all the newspapers, all the TV networks, Hollywood, all the banks, and Wall Street. It'll be a cold day in Hell before you see the truth on the televitz.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-17 18:51
>There's a Pulitzer Prize waiting for the crusading reporter who'll give us the truth
Liberal journalists would literally destroy the guy before he ever had a chance. Truth is a taboo.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-17 18:53
Chicago Way = Your vote doesn't matter
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-17 23:46
>No one dares ask that question
Fox does and they get demonized for it. Faux faux durrr herrr hurp!
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-18 8:16
they get demonized for it
That's not what they get demonized for. They get demonized for being senstionalist twats.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-18 13:48
>>11
Sooooooooooooooooo... no cogent response? Your tacit surrender is noted.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-18 16:22
^ Poe's Law.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-18 19:11
>>11
More like for not being liberal shills like most of the media is. It's funny how only Fox News get judged by such high standards when the news media itself as a whole is a rampant rape of journalistic standards.
>Researcher Ron Polland, known for his forensic investigation of Barack Obama's short-form birth certificate, now has constructed from scratch a duplicate of the document released by the White House in April, seeking to validate his contention that it was created by a forger.
Cant wait for Cain to win and unseal everything obama did, if they do find out he was born in kenya ever bill he signed, every judge he nominated, every ruling said judges had a part in, ever agency decision decided by his nominee will all be null and void.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-19 7:26
Wow, you birthers never stop, do you? Here's the only response your kind deserves:
Judge all the same...
What makes you think I don't? I never claimed the other networks were any good. Fox is still a little worse but you're right they're all shit. In face, I don't even watch TV anymore.
>>22
I still watch Jeopardy!, but even with that show, they can make subtle denigratory remarks of a subject by the way a question is phrased. It's a form of propaganda, nothing more.