There will be no more Republicans

FACT: The 20-30 age range votes Democrat at a rate of 2:1.
FACT: Upon aging very few start voting Republican, as Republicans theorized they would do upon paying taxes.

Conservatism is dead. If the 20-30 age range decided the 2008 election, only 3 states would have been Republican majority (Alaska, Texas, and some minor state that doesn't matter). In the 18-22 age range 1 in 4 people have no belief in a deity; Religion is dieing with it.

All while Republicans talk of fixing this issue by becoming more open minded and tolerant, yet they still promote a ban on gay marriage, Cannabis prohibition with even greater punishments that would effect youth the most, worsening punishments for crimes primarily committed by youth (under-age drinking, drug use, misbehaving in school, etc). They are alienating the youth. All of this seems to be in a feeble attempt to create a generation of felons, with the more traditionalist Republican children making up a minority of those felons, in an attempt to rob the Democratic majority of most of their voting power.

Congress talks of taking care of the next generation, yet nearly every action they take is opposed by the next generation.

Soon, these conservatives will witness their empire crumble. Cannabis will be smoked in their face, the power of the police will be reduced, socialist policies will be passed, the Republicans will be a fringe party while the socialist party starts to field some seats in congress, the ties Religion has with the US will be severed, no more "in god we trust" or "one nation under god", the military will be drastically cut in size, textbooks used in public  schools will speak of the incompetence of the current government, gays will be married, etc.

The only drawback is that the new generation won't be conservative enough to execute the current politicians for high treason (what they like to call 'lobbying').

>Except the Tea Party has nothing to do with living within your means, and they lack the comprehension

You're projecting whatever you want onto the Tea Party in order to make strawmen arguments. What would you know about comprehension when you have no idea what they actually believe in? That type delusion might work for you in your delusions, but you'd be laughed off the stage in a real political debate. 

>slash and burn philosophy

A convenient way of demonizing the basic common sense of keeping to a budget you can afford. There are too many nations falling apart because they run up debts and didn't nothing about it. Out of control debts are a problem and there is only one solution. 

>principles and lack the observation to understand that the Libertarian party adheres

Why do I see this repeating flaw in your logic in which you dictate to others that they believe.