Depends if the Republicans run a serious candidate or one of their fringe nut-job candidates.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-23 17:31
>>2
Fringe nutjobs rarely actually make it through primaries but who knows. The slim pickins are slim for GOP candidates right now.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-23 23:16
I heard Generic Republican beats him every time.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-23 23:27
>>4
Only problem is all the Republican candidates are worse than a "generic republican."
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-24 0:29
>>5
Which in turn is still better than the empty suit we presently have.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-24 1:28
>>2
I bet you're referencing Ron Paul, aren't you. It's funny, you know the guy must be right if the best his opponents can do is call him a "fringe nutjob".
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-24 2:11
no, he'll sail into 2012 because of the black and hispanic vote, most blacks and hispanics are racist and will only vote for him because he has a black face
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-24 2:13
actually scratch that, they wouldn't vote for lil wayne but the deciding factor for obama is because they want a black face in the white house, it's why they'll bother going to the polling booth
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-24 2:14
of course not all black and hispanics voters are racist, just the majority of them
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-24 9:11
No, he isn't finished, yes it's very hard for him at this point.
Even with approval ratings in the basement, he still leads or matches all his Republican challengers. That's probably a reflection on the quality of those candidates more than anything.
The Republican party itself is also extraordinarily unpopular, recording it's worst ever unfavorables, and congress approval at an all time low. Despite everything, Obama remains in the top tier of popularity among politicians in Washington atm.
If Obama wins, it will be in the mold of Harry Truman in 1948, who despite being very unpopular himself, convinced people that the Republicans, having just regained congress 2 years earlier after 18 years of wilderness, would be even worse. Truman not only won that election, but swept Democrats back into control of congress, which they remained in control of for the next 46 years
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-24 11:53
>>11
I actually dont care who wins, if obama is elected then ill feel even better when i tell all those obama supporters "i told you so" when the US defaults.
>>16 Any sane person would take more Bush over this shit. Wonder what Jeb is up to these days...
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-25 10:37
>>15 people you don't like
"People i don't agree with."
If the people are in the majority in a democracy then yes i want to show them that their system is shit.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-26 10:26
There's a high chance he will win the next election.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-26 15:14
Bearing in mind his potential opponents are Bachmann and Perry, he'll more than likely win since neither are remotely electable. I have no idea whose dicks Bachmann had to suck to get into the House in the first place.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-27 3:06
4 more years of nigger.
Shit.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-27 4:23
Some of you people are just fuckin stupid.
If a president is elected on his first term, he will only make so much change. So he makes sure he is reelected. On his 2nd term he wont get reelected anymore so he makes a vast number of changes then. Watch history and the effective changes made by 2nd term presidents.
Also, Obama has kinda become an idol to the public. He hasent done anything outstanding beside catching osama. So he's very likely to be voted in again since he hasent fucked anything up yet and has osama under his belt.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-27 9:03
|he hasent fucked anything up yet
Hoh what??
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-27 13:01
>>23 On his 2nd term he wont get reelected anymore so he makes a vast number of changes then.
In Obama's case, he'll make even MOAR damage in his 2nd term. So that's to be avoided.
You state a logical case like a child would. According to you, we need to re-elect every President since one term isn't good enough. Bullshit, you immature fuckhead.
>If a president is elected on his first term, he will only make so much change. So he makes sure he is reelected. On his 2nd term he wont get reelected anymore so he makes a vast number of changes then. Watch history and the effective changes made by 2nd term presidents.
A good reason why we won't re-elect him.
>Also, Obama has kinda become an idol to the public. He hasent done anything outstanding beside catching osama.
Obama isn't an idol to anyone anymore. He hasn't fixed anything. His promises weren't worth much. His health-care was a joke. He spent a lot of money and takes a 100 vacations a year. People are not amused.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-27 23:10
>>23
>Watch history and the effective changes made by 2nd term presidents.
George W. Bush. That's enough of a counterpoint.
>Obama has kinda become an idol to the public
Does having both an approval rating and a strong disapproval rating in the 40s sound like a national idol to you?
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-28 0:00
>>25
Never said every president. I only said 2nd term presidents cause the most change to our country. In our case, I think its best if we reelect him since this country begs for so much change to be made.
>>27
im only refering to his approval rating when elected. Not any possible polls that may have been voted on since then, or any published statistics.
>>26
Obamas health care plan is much different then you see it is. The final health care plan you see is the changes done by congress. His original plan has been changed vastly.
Name:
chunky dee2011-08-28 0:24
obama is the best president the us had so far by a long run c'mon now