Nature of Antisemitism

Antisemitism is just hatred of capitalism.
The Nazis suggested that the Jews were in control of all the major banks and basically pulled the strings, making them the symbol of the wealthy elites, the banks and businessmen with a disproportional amount of wealth and power. The Jews were the very symbol of internationalist imperialism. Ask the leaders of the old left-wing radical groups such as the RAF.

The Nazi party itself might not have been leftist, but it certainly started out that way. They even retained a touch of socialism even as Hitler took charge, purged the commies from his party, embraced corporatism and bent over backwards to receive funding from big business. I think that is what people mean when they say "Hitler was a Jew".

Back then, just like today, the war was not between left or right, white or black, rich or poor, but between nationalism and internationalism.

Yet strangely the National Socialists were "anti-communist". Mein Kampf speaks harshly against communism. Yet in Nazi Germany, the state owned many major industries and played a large role in people's lives.

Communism = International socialism
Nazism/Fascism = Localized socialism

>>2

A lot of these so called "pro-Nazis" and "anti-Nazis" when presented with the fact that the name of the party was the "NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMAN WORKERS' PARTY" they come up with some shitty excuse about how "they weren't really socialists". Are you insulting the greatest party of all time? Are you implying they only had a word in the name of their party to "win people over"? Fuck you. HEIL HITLER!

Hitler's policies were as progressive and left-wing any anyone can get. By today's standards, the party's social agenda, however was far-right in terms of race and such.

>>4

The status quo loves niggers and faggots so how exactly is Nazism "right wing"?

>>4
MUST you shit up EVERY thread?

Forced assimilation is right wing, extermination is left wing.

>>6
Asshole, this is MY thread.

>>5
In terms of race it was extremely conservative.

>>8
Asshole, MUST you shit up YOUR OWN threads?

>>9
Dickless, MUST you continue not having a penis?

>>10
You STILL shit up EVERY thread. MUST you?

>>11
Yes. Just to piss you off. It's working quite well.

>>11
>>12
You are both retarded and that's the bottom line because Stone Cold said so.

>>13
because Stone Cold said so.
Wrestling lost all relevancy since the late 90s.

What is the psychology behind bigotry anyway? I mean the evolutionary psychology and how these emotions are abused by politicians.

Did you know that the majority of the members of the Federal Reserve are Jews? Makes you think.

Jews have all the money. Soon they will own you too.

>>14
Wrestling is classic americana/mexicana, it is one of many fresh original ideas that has made the world a more interesting place to be in, they are body builders, actors, martial artists, athletes, stuntmen and gymnasts all rolled into one.

>>15
What is the psychology behind bigotry anyway?
Usually a superiority complex based on the (subconscious?) realisation that one's own life is made of suck and dipped in fail on at least one level. However exactly what level that is (or if they realise that, or if they're even right about that in the first place), depends on the individual bigot.

And so the need for a target. That usually means an easily-singled-out group that one can project one's own shortcomings on. Again, the exact details depend on the individual bigot, but this is the basic underlying principle.

And then there's the working principle of hate-crime: The victim (target) must always be wrong.

This is easiest to spot with classic, low-life racism. When the $THEM are coming to $HERE and getting a job while $ME remains unemployed (or stuck in a dead-end job), then the $THEM are «stealing our jobs». When the $THEM can't find a job and end up on social benefits, then they are «useless free-loaders every last one». Spot one in a jail cell, and they're «all low-life criminal scum».

Then there's the (somewhat) more subtle variety; anything that's bad about $THEM is exaggerated and/or given exaggerated focus, while anything that's good about them, gets denied, downplayed or explained away.

One example from fiction: In Equilibrium, the Prozium pushers present the "emotional highs" as something that can be lightly traded away for emotional stability, i.e. it's «not really worth all that much».

Or the real-life example of black Americans: When one turns out to be low-life scum, they get exposure galore on a certain forum, while the achievements of people like Morgan Freeman, John McWhorter et.al. gets as little exposure as possible. And the less said about the education-hostile environment they grow up in, the better.

>>20
Except that most Blacks are not like Morgan Freeman. Must you shit up every thread with this hysterical logic of yours?

>>20
Immigrants come from poor communities subject to greater stressors and thus are more likely to exhibit prejudicial attitudes. Why aren't you focussing your efforts on them? They're the ones who should be persecuted for being racist, not upstanding white men.

>>21
But Morgan Freeman is black and better than you, he deserves his great riches.

>>23
Except that most Blacks are not like Morgan Freeman. Must you shit up every thread with this hysterical logic of yours?

>>17
Do you know how the Israel was created? It isn't normal to me that small split group of people wihout political support of the most important countries of the world and without any money can take control over some country (Palestine) and drive out its people. You must be stupid to deny that.

>>1 Yea, it is funny, but Hitler was a short, small, brown-eyed, black hair Austrian, who tried to prove that tall, blue-eyed, blonde Germans should rule the world ;]

>>2 >>3 >>5

You all have fucked up vision of politics. I don't know English too well but I will try to say this as simple as I can. Communism and nazism are political AND economical ideologies. While socialism is economical ideology which says that because people are equal they must have got fair (not always equal) part of produced wealth. The opposite to this is liberalism ideology which says that people aren't equal, because some people are more talented or more hardworking than others and they should have more money because of it.

Communism is ideology which combines extreme socialism in economy (no free market, no ownership, everything is owned by everyone which means everything is owned by the government) with political ideas of global equality (no religion, no owners, no nationalities) and totalitarianism. But it is utopia as reality shows.

Nazism or hitlerism is ideology which is fusion of socialism (whole industry subordinated by government) in economy with fascism (with changes done by Hitler), which includes totalitarianism, militarism, extreme form of racism called volkism, almost religious adoration of leader and no freedom, because the affair of the nation and country are being thought to be above the affair of a man. And because of that I find stupid people who are calling themselves nazis or neo-nazis etc.

Please inform me about my mistakes, because I try to improve my English

Personally, I think it's racist that people use "Semite" or "Semitic" to refer to Jews exclusively, excluding Arabs and Ethiopians.

>>26
Arabs and Ethiopians are not human so it's not a big deal.

>>25
I think you have it mostly right. Communism, by theory, is suppose to provide for a classless, and eventually, stateless society, in practice however, it never really leaves the socialist "transition" to complete communism.

Communism only works on paper or if you kill everyone that isn't you in your nation.

>>21, >>24
notsureiftroll.jpg

Black Americans are precisely that: American. Just like rednecks and hillbillies.
Speaking of which;
　- most rednecks are not like Jeff Foxworthy.
　- most Americans are not rocket scientists.
Do you get the point, or are you too dumb?

>>22
You do know there's a difference between persecution and prosecution, right?
Besides, that logic of yours reads like "prosecute murderers or arsonists, but not both". How very impressive.

>>28
Right, because to create society of equal people it is needed to create some kind of institution (in order to keep safety, to keep control over reglamentation of goods) and then the equality disappears. Power once gained won't be given back with ease. Especially that most of the top revolutionists in communism is the most degenerated and soulless bastards ever known.

>They even retained a touch of socialism even as Hitler took charge
The nazi's were fully socialist. They supported all the same socialist babble that modern leftists support.

However, and here is the most important difference, the nazis' were NATIONALISTS.
Socialists/communists every where else are INTERNATIONAL socialists/communists.
Very fundamental difference.

International socialists are fake socialists, they don't really care about anything, it's empty words to them. They seek power through deception and propaganda.
Hitler was a nationalist who cared for his people and country, that is why he was a socialist. That is why he was a NATIONAL SOCIALIST.

>>28
The "theory" of communism is utopian babble where scarcity disappears magically and noone ever has to work again. Paradise!
Utter nonsense, no point even discussing. Proper solution to a delusional communist is a bullet in the head.

>>19
Here is the delusional commie babble i'm talking about. "bigotry" is a natural and normal thought process because we're different and belong to racial groups. Such a thing as kin altruism, it is not natural to practice altruism and "empathy" to strangers.
The leftist permits the natural altruism and empathy of the white race, directing it not at their own kind, but at all other kinds. Utterly degenerate.

>>33
Go back to bed, Bob Whitaker.

>>34
Who the fuck is Bob Whitaker? Another stupid American?

>>33
lol there are no fundamental differences, there is no ideology, only propoganda, tyrants just make shit up whenever it suits them

>>36
There are vast differences just because you are too fucking stupid to figure it out, etc.


>>30
Funny, slander of whites is normal huh? Fuck off you cultural marxist traitor.
MORGAN FREEMAN IS AN ACTOR, THE ONLY REASON HE GETS ROLES IS BECAUSE HE'S A NIGGER!

So liberals are International socialists. That explains a lot.

>>37
The only differences are in what measures they use to pacify populations in different economic situations and with different subjective tastes.

>>37
slander of whites is normal huh?
Wow, you really are too dumb to get it. (Hint: splinter in your brother's eye)

Also, the fact that nobody (least of all you) seems to have even noticed the other black guy I mentioned, just goes to prove my point.