9/11 conspiracy (be polite please)

Hi.

My threads on /b/ about 9/11 go 404 really fast. So I decided I'll write here.

What do you think about 9/11 conspiracy?

Before you answer, please go to TPB, search for "Loose Change American Coup", download the documentary and watch it.

First I've seen first version of this film in 2007. Then I've seen 2nd and 3rd edition (American Coup). I think I'm sane. But after the facts (the facts that was even broadcasted on that day, the facts that everybody can search on internet) about conspiracy are much more accurate than those served by news.

Also if you dig into NIST investigation, you'll find that it intentionally omit facts/witnesses (like Barry Jennings who was in WTC7 before it collapsed and was captured by news when he got out from WTC7 on 9/11). This year they released final report on 9/11. They claim they can't explain fall of WTC7 but they also note that they didn't considered bombs (Barry said he heard bombs all the time).

I think I'm one of 1000000 who believe this. What do you think?

>>29
This article is based on WTC7 final 120 page NIST report. So no investigation here.

Again, I won't address every single point but most (if not all) of the arguments made by "debunkers" don't require that you accept NIST as a valid source.

For example, "steel can't melt from jet fuel" is not proof that the planes couldn't have caused the collapse because steel wouldn't have to melt. Any engineering handbook can verify that steel becomes much weaker at those temperatures.