9/11 conspiracy (be polite please)

Hi.

My threads on /b/ about 9/11 go 404 really fast. So I decided I'll write here.

What do you think about 9/11 conspiracy?

Before you answer, please go to TPB, search for "Loose Change American Coup", download the documentary and watch it.

First I've seen first version of this film in 2007. Then I've seen 2nd and 3rd edition (American Coup). I think I'm sane. But after the facts (the facts that was even broadcasted on that day, the facts that everybody can search on internet) about conspiracy are much more accurate than those served by news.

Also if you dig into NIST investigation, you'll find that it intentionally omit facts/witnesses (like Barry Jennings who was in WTC7 before it collapsed and was captured by news when he got out from WTC7 on 9/11). This year they released final report on 9/11. They claim they can't explain fall of WTC7 but they also note that they didn't considered bombs (Barry said he heard bombs all the time).

I think I'm one of 1000000 who believe this. What do you think?

>So only a few people working on the project know the full scope of it? That would work to keep it a secret during the time it was being done but not after. Almost anyone involved would be able to put two and two together once the towers fell. And like I said, wouldn't at least one of those people blow the whistle? It's been almost ten years now.

That depends. If you work for intelligence and leak some data I think you won't end up good. Also seniors can simply reject what you say. And since you don't know whole truth (say, you were asked to throw a passport on the grass at the night for $1000) you can be considered fool unless you force a lot of people on your side. But TBH I don't know any illuminati traitor.

>I agree that it's possible. It just seems very unlikely to me. These movies present what looks like evidence but none of it amounts to proof. I have yet to see anything conclusive coming from your camp so I see no reason to belive them.

They had Barry before he passed. How many proofs you have? Articles like ^? I posted some sites too.

>I won't bother responding to each of those. You can google 9/11 debunking yourself. This is a good starting point: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center

This article is based on WTC7 final 120 page NIST report. So no investigation here. This is the report http://issuu.com/jfkii/docs/nicstar1a.pdf (TOC is on page 19).

I'm not in mood for reading long research paper.

(also I'm newfag)