You can grow hemp in some states now if you have a license. Go to community college and study agricultural science, work for an evil corporation for a few years and all the while gain new skills and send prospective letters to hemp growers in these states and remain in communication and research the industry to find possible places for you and the qualifications and experience you need. When you find a position finish your tenure at your evil corporation and go grow hemp.
Thanks for showing us that you are completely clueless on this issue.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 14:28
>16
haha
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 14:46
>>14
Actually, making things illegal is what drives prices up. Name another weed that's so easy to grow but is still sold at such prices and prove me wrong.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 14:53
It's all nice and progressive to argue for the legalization of cannabus. But, if weed became legal and socially acceptable it would be 10x more destructive than alcohol. I would like to live in a world where criminalization of weed wasn't necessary too. But I don't want to be home invaded and have my wife raped by a psycho weedhead who wants to steal my VCR to sell it on the black market to get money for his next "shot". So for now, it would seem necessary to keep it banned.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 14:59
>>19
Yeah, because weed makes people so agro.
Your post is so fucking hilarious. If weed was legal, people would grow it in their yards, like we do he in CA, and it would cost about as much as a tomato.
Oh wait, you must be trolling.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 15:58
>>19
Has to be a troll. If not seriously go out an educate yourself.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 15:59
>>20
A tomato is not a drug. There are people who can't afford tomatoes, you know. But they don't go on robbing sprees because they can live without tomatoes. They just eat frozen/fast food with a high calorie/dollar value like everybody else in the ghetto. And tomatoes don't alter your brain chemistry/cause psychosis. Because tomatoes aren't drugs.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 17:07
>>22
They can also grow their own tomatoes and feed themselves.
BTW, I bet that if i asked you to define what makes a drug you wouldn't be able to.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 17:53
>>23
A weedhead who has a garden full of weed won't have a garden for much longer. Or a house, or a job. Street life will deteriorate both his mind and body as he preys on innocent victims.
A definition for drug? For the purpose of this discussion I would say any substance being used for recreational intoxication.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 18:38
>>24
Really? Because last time I checked they ran businesses and/or they had proper jobs. Street life? Where do you get these things?
Is coffee a drug? Tea? sugar? mate? What's wrong with recreational intoxication? We do it all the time. Let alone cigarettes and alcohol.
PS. They say smoking is slow death. But I'm not in a rush.
Marijuana isn't an intoxicant because an intoxicant by definition is toxic. Marijuana isn't toxic.
(not to mention intoxication generally refers to alcohol and not all drugs in general)
Fail Troll is Fail.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 19:17
>>26
To what degree is Marijuana non-toxic? That is the more important question. Toxicity is essentially dependant on dosage. There is some evidence that THC can negatively affect neurological development in adolescents and thus may, by some definitions, be described as toxic.
Personally I am pro legalisation, but to say that THC (or Marijuana in general) is non-toxic and thus safe is disingenuous
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-23 19:20
>>27
Toxicity describes a substance with the ability to kill someone with a certain dose. Marijuana's toxic dose is so high it has never been verified, thus it is labeled "non-toxic"
Whenever anyone points out the large percentage of felons with marijuana in their systems at the time of their arrest for charges unrelated to marijuana, they pull some unclever comeback out of their ass such as "those felons all breathed air, let's make air illegal". "Those felons all ate food, let's make food illegal".
Such logical fallacies.
Air and food aren't drugs.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-25 6:22
>>30
Correlation does not imply causation. There's a logical fallacy for you.
Cigars are more harmful than Marihuana and taking your Marihuana is no more or less incapacitating than a drunken stupor or lack of sleep, if those are the limits then they are within the legal limits, I would also prefer if the business was in the hands of lawful professionals rather than uncontrolled street thug punkolas who in more compassionate times (towards victims) would be dangling from a tree by a rope around the neck, it would mean more profits for America's great multi-national corporations. This is why I support the legalization of this plant.
>>36
Marijuana is a slang term for a different plant entirely.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-26 10:11
Funny that any 5 year old kid can go to the corner store and get a can of coffee..drink a dozen black cups and be an absolute drugged-out psychopath. Much more dangerous than any cannabis ever thought of being. I don't suppose coffee would be any kind of threat to DuPont Mylar, or other major plastic, fabric or paper industries/corporations.. The article points out only one of the many that co-lobbied back in the day.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-27 17:28
>any 5 year old kid
>drink twelve (12) cups of coffee
>psychopath
what_the_fuck_am_i_reading.jpg
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-27 18:07
>>38
Growing hemp isn't illegal in several states. Where are the evil corporations there?