Barak W. Bush ( his new name) is a total failure and hypocrite.
Defend him if you've got the stones...
Name:
Anonymous2011-03-28 22:32
There were no weapons of mass destruction in Libya, you're right!
Name:
Anonymous2011-03-28 22:56
no, we elected obama for change
change like:
tax cuts to the rich
spending like a drunken sailor
and fighting a war in the middle east we have no business being in
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-09 20:08
So, how's that hopey-changey thing working out for y'all?
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation." Barack Obama, December 2007
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-09 20:28
But he is obliged to uphold treaty obligations that Congress signed us into, like those we have with the UN.
And you're going to blame him for tax cuts for the rich with literally the least cooperative congress in history? Do you even read the articles, or just the headlines?
We have to be involved in the middle east on way or another becasue thats where the energy is. we might as well fight on the right side.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-10 0:50
Why are they called "tax cuts for the rich" when they lowered taxes for everyone?
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-10 1:59
>>7
Because when the so called "Bush era tax cuts" were first passed, they proportionally benefited the wealthy much more than the poor. Mainly from reducing taxes on capital gains and dividends.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-10 14:26
>>8
Taxes are based on percentages. 7% of a billion dollars is a lot more than 7% of $35,000. So what exactly is your point?