>>70
http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm
For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him, out of two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others.
Lesser evils are awesome, they're not really lesser evils at all! You point your finger and call them evil but morality depends on what is better, not what is best, evil being omnipresent, lesser evil is what is good. Lesser evil is good.