>>64
>>65
>>66
That's stupid, you are all thinking in terms of collectives like a bunch of illogical socialists. Police are individuals and this is more significant than "only a few are bad, don't generalise, bla bla bla", it means the administrative situation is more complex which also means there are more options than some sliding scale of how much physical force cops should be allowed to use.
We should use a multi-tier solution relying on both rigid command structured policies and flexible guidelines that rely on police initiative and autonomy in combination with new educational techniques, and it should be all based around the political atom, the individual. Science has upgraded to quantum physics, we've discovered classical physics is just an approximation and one not accurate enough to allow us to apply quantum phenomena on our scale, it's time social science caught up.
Take for example the stanford prison experiment, of course we should place limits on police powers, we should also factor in powers which allow them to do their jobs more effectively, on top of these we should take different approaches, we should go right ahead and show them the stanford prison experiment and use the results to prepare them for when they are tempted to show hubris and go on a power-trip. We need to show them that the guards in this experiment were acting like animals, like children and that their job is in large part to overcome hubris, frustration and hate and other emotions as well like empathy, maybe even love though I don't know where that fits in. Just to do their jobs rationally and logically.