Next Great President

When will we ever have a president worthly of putting on Mount Rushmore?

Obama is pretty worthy.

>>2
It would have to be carved elsewhere due to his dark skin hues.

>>2

becourse of the welfare?

...ha...

>>4
Civil rights hero, national healthcare, repealed don't ask don't tell, ended the war in Iraq, closed Guantanamo, ended waterboardingby US officials, ended the recession with stimulus package and creating jobs, cut defense spending, credit card reform, legalized stem cell research and encouraged American science altogether, and made his administration the most transparent one ever by far. Not to mention he was the first non-white president, inspired all Americans and restored america's image on the world stage. He shouldn't just be put on mt. Rushmore, he should be on the dollar bill.

Troll harder, >>5.  You forgot to say that Obongo can walk on water and his tears cure cancer.

>>5
Civil rights hero,
Hiring people just because they are an ethnic minority?
national healthcare
What national healthcare?
ended the war in Iraq
What peace?
closed Guantanamo, waterboarding
Oh no, those poor terrorists, pass the kleenex.
ended the recession
20% unemployed? Ok, no.
encouraged American science altogether
More corn subsidies for monsanto?
he should be on the dollar bill
We probably won't be using them anymore due to Obama-Bernanke's hyperinflation.

>>7
We could always cave his face onto eggplants.

http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/

Faggots.

>>9
That list isn't real impressive, unless you're the kind of America-hating faggot who thought there was a desperate need for someone to sign yet another meaningless arms-control treaty with the Russians, who have never abided by an arms-control treaty in all of recorded history.  Or felt there was a crying need for the President of the United States to carry out an unconstitutional takeover of the automobile industry in order to dictate to them what kind of vehicles they can and cannot make, in total defiance of what the marketplace wants.  I'm not impressed.  Try harder.

>>9
>obama increased spending on X
>obama increased spending on X
>obama increased spending on X
>obama increased spending on X
>obama increased spending on X
>obama increased spending on X
Cool skewed statistics bro, he could increase spending on something by 1 dollar and it would end up on that list. Also increasing spending isn't always good, Obama isn't paying for your gas and mortgage, he's spending your money and that of the business that employs you (probably not for much longer due to excessive taxation and takeovers by soviet style state planned corporations), the crux is whether the government does a better job of spending that money than you, not how much they increase spending.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI

>>9
Not bad of a site, I would like one for Congress as well.

>>10
The Constitution is flawed in that essentially anything could be argued to be Constitutional because of the Necessary and Proper clause.

>>11
That is true, but not everything that was listed on that site is "spending".

I love how the conservatives and republicans love arguing when they have nothing to argue with.

>>>10
>12 year old that thinks somebody "hates America" because they disagree with them about reducing massive costly stockpiles
>doesnt know anything about arms treaties as Russians HAVE abided by most, same track record as us, which you dont know becauase you never bothered to look it up and just make shit up as you go along.
btw why would you say "in history" when you clearly know nothing about it? You could have left the context open to inturpretation and looked light slightly less of a failtard
>cite precedent for the auto bailouts being unconstitutional. The loud man on the radio screaming something does not make it true.
>the auto bailouts were voluntary, again, show how this is unconstitutional, your answer should be pretty funny
>the auto bailouts had nothing to do with running the companies, what changes they have made in production arose due to the logistics of consolidating productivity after plant closures, again try actually having some idea what the fuck you are talking about. You could have so much ammunition to criticise the bailouts that it isnt even remotely funny, yet you are so fucking stupid that you rely on lies and nonsense when the facts would have worked

>Bush started the Auto bailouts with Tarp funds anyways, way to keep informed buddy.


Do you have anything else to say that is ignorant and stupid? Try harder.
 
Damn Neocons. Whenever you open your mouths, you errode actual conservatism

>>14
>Russians HAVE abided by most
lol this is what idiot libs actually believe.
Also stockpiles of nukes is a negligible expense vs socialist health care, welfare, handouts, and so on. A few billion vs a few trillion given to niggers, mexcrement, and elderly? Hmm i wonder which is more valuable.
>the auto bailouts were voluntary,
ya "voluntary" in that you take it, pay the interest on it, or we will kill your company.
>the auto bailouts had nothing to do with running the companies
the ENTIRE REASON the american car industry is in trouble has to do with government regulation telling them what they have to do.


>>12
>The Constitution is flawed
no
>>11
>the crux is whether the government does a better job of spending that money than you
No there is no "debate" about that, the liberal approves of government spending because they have some sort of fantasy world idea that government is necessary, good, and beneficial. Which is an obvious fiction. All you have to do is take a glance at what the government spends money on. Go take a walk down near mexcrement or niggers, every single dollar they have is from your or my pocket courtesy of government.

>>15
no
Lol, nice rebuttal there, chief. It is flawed; stop treating it like it's some sacred text. Sure, completely replacing it would be throwing out the baby with the bathwater, but saying it's perfect is foolish and naïve.

>>16
It's also the highest law of the land, and conspiring to subvert it is called "high treason."  HTH.  HAND.

>>17
conspiring to subvert it is called "high treason."
Like politicians haven't been doing that for over 100 years already. Read up on the "Necessary and Proper" clause, and you'll see how easy it becomes to "subvert" it. HTH. HAND.

>over 100 years
Actually the last bits of the Constitution were destroyed by the Jew Communist Rosenfelt administration in 1933.

>>19
^{[citation needed]}

lets get some ron paul up in this bitch

if I get dubs Obama is a great president

>>22
faggot

>>23
dipshit

>>24
Go back to /b/

Maybe you buttfucks need to start looking at the USA from a European perspective? We are, after all, your "closest allies".
The US constitution is nice. It inspired constitutions like the Norwegian and the French, which ended up real nice too.
When Obama came to power, Europe was very happy, because we thought you'd finally gotten yourself a decent president. Well, turns out we were wrong. Obama is just like any other American president. Why did this happen, you ask. Because there are so many EGOISTIC tards in the USA! Most of them are Conservatives. What you need is to cooperate more and look outside of your own country to see how you can improve your society.
By the way, the American system is worse than that of the Soviet Union was. You call the USA a democratic country? Fuck that. More like a totalitarian regime.

>>25

tsk

Right now we have President that is worthy of Mt. Rushmore.

>>>28
*astral high five*

>>28
I think Obama would go a little better on Mt. FAILmore.

AHAAHAHHHAHHHAHAHAAA!

Confederation was made a naughty word as reminiscent of slavery.

Confederation would be an ideal where the federal gov had power limited to dealings between US and other countries.
Whereas the State had sovereign power over the policy and prosperity of its own people.  It would allow for 50 different forms of governance, Rather than this megalith of social justice dynamiting cultural enclaves in the name of equality.

There will never be a modern president capable of being on Mount Rushmore.

If Democrats put Obama on it, or Republicans put Reagan on it, it'd be slammed as a political takeover of the monument by the other side.

But then again, pretty much every President has something toxic about his administration that would more than likely 'prevent' them from being added to Rushmore by today's media.  Even if you wanted, say, James K. Polk, you'd have people crying why an 'imperialist' is being added to Rushmore.  William Henry Harrison?  All he did was die of pneumonia when he tried to show off.  Zachary Taylor?  "Who is that? He must have not done anything worthwhile since he's not really mentioned."

/imageboard discussion/

/imageboard discussion/

Ahem. SO, bitches....

I'm not crazy, I'm not a troll. But, I love the Matrix, Stephen King's Dreamcatcher and Food Incorporated.

If any of you hate the corporations like Cargill, Perdue (if you speak french, this name is ironic) and the destruction that others like them are wreaking upon the earth and humanity in the name of profit, then I invite 4chan to expose them. Take the red pill, and the most rocking trip since time began.

If I have inadvertantly posted in the wrong board, please forgive me and direct me to another. This same message will appear again and again until Anonymous finds it and chooses to act. or not. I mean, it's up to them. But, if they've successfully targeted Scientology then American corporations and special interests ought to be a piece of cake.

Ready for the revolution?

Answer: When Obama grows some balls and becomes the leader he was born to be. He should also listen more to that fabulous sexpot Rahm Emanuel. He swears like a bitching trooper, but he knows where he's at. Let's bring Rahm back to the whitehouse and give Obama the freedom to achieve everything he has ever dreamed of.

comeoncomeoncomeon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So, no chance of him being reelected? Just thinking about Palin running this country makes me want to strangle myself with my intestines.

>>37
makes me want to strangle something

All US presidents are mass murderers. try to name one that isn't.
Stop worshiping mass murderers!

... makes me want to strangle myself with my intestines
Go ahead.  There'll be nothing lost in the case you're wrong.

Stop worshiping mass murderers!
No.  It's fun.

>>38
We're coming to YOUR country next :)

WARNING: The next plane to leave to New York will be blown up.
Truthfully Yours,

Jiihad

>>2
HAHAHA NO. Obama didn't deserve that Nobel either.