>>69
They're most likely only publishing stuff they already have. If they get new stuff it won't be from anon posters, hence less of it. After all, who wants to blow the whistle on some big company and then get put in jail/sued/murdered down a back alley for it? Wikileaks had it's 15 minutes of fame. Now it'll just fade into the background like most other websites will. Wikileaks doesn't make the news anymore. Assange only makes it for making a fuss about his extradition. Noone will even rememember it in 10 years unless they look in a history book. It'll just be "That site that published secret stuff noone wanted you to know"