>>42
You can say whatever you want. There's freedon of speach for everyone here. Still, I find ad hominem attacks (attacking someone's person rather than his opinions) quite dishonest. Still, if someone if a public figure we have a democratic obligation to criticise. If we want to be honest we need to criticise WHAT they say. Not the way they say it, their color, sex etc. And I'm not being anal here. These are the basic rules of conversation.
The fact that someone puts himself in danger to tell us what our governments (our elected representatives) don't, is heroic in a sense. I'm not going to judge this person's character.
If the idea behind wikileaks and openleaks works, it should help countries operate more democraticaly. This should be benaficial for everyone. We can all sense the danger of the world elitism. No matter what political background we come from. Letting politicians have secrets is not very democratic at all. We don't care what they do in their private lifes but we have to know exactly what they are doing in their political lives otherwise democracy falls appart. I don't care if it's wikileaks, openleaks or whatever leaks. Public information about policies, politicians and their actions should be public (as the word says) but isn't. And if our elected representatives choose to hide it from us, then it's a case of theft. This means that if someone steals is back and brings it back and returns it for free, is not realy a thief as he didn't steal anything, he returned something to its rightfull owner, at his own cost as well!