>>7
Have you actually read any of the cables? There's nothing really controversial in them. Watergate was much more embarrassing in comparison. All the cables did was confirm what most people knew or suspected already.
>>9
[citations needed]
>>10
Apparently you know something that nobody else does.
What I've said in
>>5 can be found on the BBC website, including the interviews that Assange was given while in custody in the UK. And as far as I know, the US Department of Justice hasn't filed anything against WikiLeaks or Assange (besides threatening to do something for months now), just some rousers in Congress being belligerent and boisterous as usual. Not to mention certain American media inflating the situation and misinforming the public because they're paid to do so.