Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

You dicks.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 13:01

The FCC just voted to start regulating the internet.

Hope all you dicks that voted for Obama are happy.

The FCC vote to do this was 3 - 2 in favor of regulating.
3 democrats voted to regulate it.
2 republicans voted against regulation.

You dicks.

Name: finalturismo 2010-12-22 15:08

Recently, Mr. Genachowski suggested that instead of selectively slowing certain traffic to cope with congestion, providers could consider charging consumers for how much data they consume. That would be a departure from the flat monthly fees consumers pay now for Web access.
Mr. Genachowski = FCC chairman
Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...#ixzz18qyRUfKG

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 15:38

LOOK FOR USERS TO HELP ME SEND OUT MILLIONS OF EMAILS TO WARN THE INTERNET ON THE COMING FCC REGULATIONS
EMAIL ME AT FINALTURISMO@GMAIL.COM

I HAVE ALL THE SKILLS NEEDED
AND WILL BE SHOWING INTERNET USERS HOW TO EXTRACT MILLIONS OF EMAILS FROM WEBSITES WITHIN A DAY AND SEND OUT MILLIONS OF EMAILS.


CONTACT ME NOW @ FINALTURISMO@GMAIL.COM

YOU WILL BE RECEIVING A RESPONSE INSTANTLY

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 7:56

Goddamn Democrat vermin!

The totalitarian Communist party in America, the Democrats, are far worse than the Republicans ever were.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 7:57

Should have voted for Ron Paul. Niggers.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 13:34

>>5
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 9:17

Bump

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-30 14:37

WTF?

The GOP is the party against net neutrality. The Dems. support it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-30 14:55

Guys, the "regulation" is meant to STOP the businesses from controlling the content we can and can't access. This is a boon to the people of the internet and will help net neutrality. Don't assume that regulation ==totalitarianism. Here, regulation wants to stop totalitarianism.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-30 16:31

>>9
You don't cure a cold by blowing your nose.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-30 21:57

>>10
I heard if you drink yuor own piss it will cure the common cold

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-31 18:59

>>11
Go back to /b/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-01 3:44

>>12
maybe you should go back to /pee/

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-01 11:39

>>11
>>12
?b/ or not, I've heard that too. Some people swear by piss.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-01 15:58

>>14
well drink some then!!?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-01 16:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-01 16:53

>>16
but I just gots here and kind like it here

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-01 17:42

>>17
Well, as long as you can keep the /b/ shit in /b/, you're welcome to stay.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-01 18:11

>>16,18
NIGGER

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-02 0:05

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-02 4:03

>>18
I can poopies see ¯\(°_o)/¯

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-02 4:13

>>20
NIGGER

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-02 12:48

“You want the truth? You can’t handle the truth!”

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-02 16:32

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-02 18:58

>>24
GET THE ROPE EBENEEZER, WE GOT OURSELVES A NIGNOGNIGGERSKIN

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-02 19:00

>>24
NIGGER

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-02 23:58

Name: Angieisback 2011-01-08 16:25

Fuck Obama, regulate that

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-08 21:20

Guys, we need regulation, without regulation we can see things like the pirate bay slowing the fuck down.

Now who the fuck wants that. Regulation means everyone gets equal share. That's good, for the internet at least.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 2:01

>>29
PirateBay would be slowing down due to increased use and, in general, the Internet growing larger and more complicated.  There really isn't anything "regulation" can do to fix that.

You know how torrent sites can be taken down due copyright issues? or how YouTube removes videos based on copyrighted content in the video?  Not only must regulation necessarily make that much more widespread and "efficient," but it would also make it much more difficult to contest.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 14:23

other than our internet freedoms being restrained and killed, hope you can keep your connections on after paying to try to go anywhere:
http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2011/01/obamas-5-gallon-gas-just-ahead


You Dicks. You Dicks!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 14:40

>>31
Gonna keep happpening till till the rich are taken out of the equation

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 15:20

You Dicks.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 16:54

>>32
I don't see how being rich has anything to do with the price of oil when national self-produced oil is being hampered.  Also, China has increased demand which affects the price in general, especially if OPEC nations maintain steady export rather than an expanding one.  (Also, again, you wrote "till" twice.)

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 20:49

Uh speculation markets >>34

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 20:50

>>35
Yes; and?

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List