>>7
You write like you have a fragile flow of logic. You never even really re-defined what "libertarian" means, if your standard definition is flawed or false like you suggested and I am interested in hearing your alternative. You do an excellent job of conforming to the OP's expectations of a person who has nothing but slogans and buzzwords on their side. Moreover, Monopoly the game was actually as a criticism of a strict land-value tax system (Georgism) so its presentation and intent are purposefully straightforward and brutal.
I also believe it is your fault for not being able to find something to believe in. Once you have enslaved yourself to other people's definitions, nothing would ever stand scrutiny. Do you mean to say that "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is not a worthwhile goal?