TAKE TAKE TAKE, THAT ALL THEY DO SINCE COMING TO BRITAIN.
Multiculturalism has Britain failed because they refuse to integrate with British people and move out of their own community, turning part of England into ghettos.
Name:
Anonymous2010-10-17 20:07
This is true, not just for the UK, but worldwide.
Name:
Anonymous2010-10-17 22:19
There are several ways to reverse this,as I said the people of europe do not want it,why can you lot not see that ?
1.Stop all immigration by economic migrants.... NOW.
2.Find and deport ALL illegal immigrants....NOW.
3.Stop all immigration from third world countries as these are the ones in general, who do not economically add to our country.For every doctor nurse we get from them,there are a lot more claiming benefits,never having contributed.
4.Stop all family members apart from immediate family being allowed over here to live and claim benefits.
5.Limit child allowance to 2 children.
6.If an immigrant is coming to this country,THEY MUST HAVE WORK...not 1 armed plumbers/joiners.
7.Stop PC,for this is doing the most amount of damage,as it is infuriating people to the extent of prejudice.
8.End the pathetic rule of housing,in that immigrants go to the bottom of the list and work their way up.Just like the indigenous people,not just because you turned up here with 8 kids and no job.
9.Get out of europe,take back our own law making ability.
10.Reinforce the borders.
Name:
Anonymous2010-10-18 3:44
Pushing for either multiculturalism or monoculturalism is stupid.
And yeah... Multi-animalism has failed.
Bring in the enforced busings, Little Rock style.
You don't have bayonets ya slimey pussies so ur gonna need a shtload of bobbies. Every biatch on this Planet deserves a vibrant face! =)
Name:
Anonymous2010-10-19 5:42
>>12
Niggers wouldn't have touched my face. You must be on some straight up meth to think that.
Name:
Anonymous2010-10-19 6:09
>>11
So you want to get rid of the monarchy? How will that work?
Name:
Anonymous2010-10-19 17:43
>>14
The monarchy is already almost gone. It's had ceremonial significance solely for two hundred and fifty years or more. Elected politicians have all the power now, for good or ill. Britain is already a republic in all but name.
Name:
Anonymous2010-10-19 19:12
ceremonial significance solely for two hundred and fifty years or more.
lol wut. tell that to george washington.
Name:
Anonymous2010-10-20 10:15
>>16 Is that the George Washington who was the first British American president!
Your argument lacks any credible evidence offered other than a general vague view of a country as a whole. Actually, Britain has gained a large amount from a mixed-society.
Yes illegal immigration is a problem but the view you take is that all races are bad... a very backward point.
Trade as well as religious tolerance and understanding is brought by this. However; it is true extremism is brought by this unfortunately :'( *sigh* look at it this way
The future is of equality and another world wide war is forthcoming if we reject the integration, however your point does stand...more could be done, but as a modern era 2nd millennia world, we have another 990 years to realize our potential. We may however, only need a 100 if a war is on the way...such a bright deadly future.
Name:
Anonymous2010-10-31 18:51
>>The future is of equality
Freedom is slavery. War is peace. Ignorance is strength.
>>another world wide war is forthcoming if we reject the integration
Really? Explain your claim. Give us a citation at the very least for this fever dream.
Name:
Anonymous2010-10-31 22:39
>>19 Actually, Britain has gained a large amount from a mixed-society.
List them. And no, "food" doesn't count.
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-01 3:06
Multiculturalism has indeed been shit for Britain, kick out the anglo's and normans! CYMRU AM BYTH!!
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-01 11:55
tension between races is always there, moreover investigate the happenings of India and the newly formed Pakistan, the rejection of faith is there and a dispute is unsettled. While this is only faith, it represents a large scale view that many take of Asians, Africans, or others, that these races are inferior, trying not to mention the most haunting 2nd world war.
My point being that to fully understand one another and bring peace, all must be able mingle in the 'hall of culture' if you would.
And Britain has, the education of religion, the understanding of one another, the chance to bring others a fairer side to what may have been a war torn state from whence they come and the trade that many can bring as well as knowledge, books, the list is largely extensive.
Huge awesome sauce for welshy here.
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-02 5:31
Since when is the United Kingdom multicultural anyway? They don't have no "obligation" to house and support third world immigrants. England is for English, Scotland is for Scottish, Wales is for Welsh, and Ireland is for Irish.
DATS RACIST IF ONLY ETHNIC ENGLISHMEN LIVE IN ENGLAND!
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-03 18:11
?? Seems the british right has much in common with their ignorant American cousins.
So, multiculturalism failed in the UK? The UK should be kept mono-cultural? The english, scots, welsh, manx, ulters and northern irish...thats all one culture, eh?
Correct me if my history is off, but isnt what is now considered 'british' the multicultural result of French Normans who conquered and absorbed (not assimilated) the German Angles and Saxons, who themselves have conquered and absorbed the Breton/Cornish/Welsh/Scotting celts, who themselves had conquered and absorbed the Pictish peoples before them?
???
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-04 11:35
>>26
What does that have to do with the ongoing invasion and colonization of the UK by Arabs and niggers? European cultures are one thing. Turd World savages do not even rate use of the world "culture" to describe them.
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-05 11:48
>>26
No, British conservatives generally think Britain should be neither multicultural or monocultural. What's so difficult to understand about that?
Culture is just a set of ideas, people should choose the best ideas and discard the worst ideas without regard to where they originated from, it's just logical that way. As for racis, that can be cured by rugged individualism, not dumbshit collectivism.
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-05 13:46
Europeans forced their way into their New World colonies with firearms and Christianity. Niggers and Arabs were RECENTLY invited by Jews into their new European homes.
There's a BIG difference.
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-06 7:51
>>29
Wrong, Jews imported African slaves to America and have been a problem since then.
The case with the United States and the rest of the New World is different which is why I was discussing Europe.
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-06 17:32
I'm from a developing country myself, and I agree with OP. And seriously, why should western countries (in fact, any country) be forced to cater to immigrants?
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-06 18:17
>>32
because western countries are democracies and the majority of people in these countries enjoy bending over for foreign dicks
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-06 18:25
>>33
But democracy by definition is "rule of the people" and I don't see British people having much rule. Hell, it sounds like they're treated like second hand citizens in their own country from what I'm hearing.
I think these pseudo democratic states should just drop the act and admit they're not serving the people.
Enoch was right obvs. You need a nice sane political party that will send communists jews muslims gays and commies to the gas chamber. EDL BNP and the like are watery moderate lefty fags. ConDem and the Labour are buttsex poofter dirtchutes.
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-12 4:14
I said communists twice. Fuck that shit
Name:
Anonymous2010-11-12 16:19
Norsefire: Strength Through Purity, Purity Through Faith