I keep seeing the word "nigger" posted everywhere and it appears a lot of people here hate black people. Why?
Name:
Anonymous2010-07-25 4:38
I think a lot of those who hate or insult the entire people are trolls. Just saying group think things that either fall into the outrageous attention seeking / probing OR they genuinely believe all black people deserve hatred and their surrounding peers are influenced by a shown hatred.
Blacks are more proportionately hated for being different, higher crime rates, misunderstanding between cultures and language (even though they speak English), forced multiculturalism, one drop loss of European genetics. Etc.
To hate them all is unwarranted, but stereotypes are some what logical as a precautionary and 'not set in stone' first view point.
Name:
Anonymous2010-07-25 7:17
>>1
Same reason you see the word Jew and faggot... has a lot to do with shock value.."Oh my God! He said Nigger! You're not allowed to say nigger!" Tell me I can't say it and I will...
People finding it abhorrent that it is more likely for certain races to do certain thing is also relevant.
To ignore either side is close-minded. To be predisposed to dislike anyone without knowing them at all is illogical. To think that Compton is high crime because it is solely a poor area is not being realistic either.
There is great reason to be 'culturalist' and dislike the habits of miscreant cultures (lack of culture), families that teach violence and guile etc.
There is also reason to be marginally racist. Some may disagree but I base it on experience, history and modern sciences findings. This does not mean you have to be hateful or patronizing and many will force you to wear when you think this way.
There is little reason to be hateful or vengeful. For someone elses lack of understanding.
I find it abhorrent that dogs like to eat their own shit. That doesn't mean that they don't do it. Reality never takes a poll, it simply is.
And there is evidence for differences between races. In most cases the differences are maybe 5% of IQ or thereabouts, and on the other side a much stronger athletic ability. Facts don't require me to hate (PS, it's called trolling, newb.). I think recognizing differences is totally logical. Or do you think Women should be lumberjacks? It wouldn't work based on sex differences.
Name:
Anonymous2010-07-26 18:33
>>8 And there is evidence for differences between races.
Cite your sources.
Name:
Anonymous2010-07-27 20:01
>>9
Get out of Mommy's basement and walk down the street.
Name:
Anonymous2010-07-27 22:23
>>10
That's not a source. Even a simple observation of a group of blacks on a sidewalk of a busy intersection and writing down such an observation can even laughably be considered a source. A proper, scientific, peer-reviewed, journal that there are, without a doubt, inherent differences between the races. Anything less is plainly disingenuous.
So again, cite your sources, being that the burden of proof is on you.
Name:
Anonymous2010-07-28 0:05
WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT BLACK RACES?! WHY THE FUCK IS MY WOMEN OUT OF THE DAM KITCHEN!>?
Name:
Anonymous2010-07-28 0:12
you dont have blacks, you hate niggers, like how our troops help arabs, but kill terrorists, get my drift?
Tonnes of sources backing racial difference, there is reason for dissent, but merely the differing Haplogroups, prominence of sickle cell anemia, (and various immunity issues) sun absorption, roller jaw, extended shin bones, DIFFERENCE IN SKIN COLOR, show that there are genetic differences between the race and that we are at different levels in our evolutionary chain. Which races are further ahead is subjective really, blacks out breed whites so are theoretically and practically more 'successful' regardless of nearly all modern marvels and inventions coming from white / aryan / AS Dna, if they give it all away and don't use it for success, they don't necessarily deserve success.
Name:
Anonymous2010-07-29 18:16
>>15
He won't debate honestly with you. Mandatory egalitarianism-at-gunpoint is the new holy of holies. Any suggestion that it is, perhaps, insane, based on lies, etc., is met with the unthinking bray DAT'S RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST.
Five hundred years ago the Church damn near burned Galileo at the stake for daring to suggest that the Earth went around the Sun rather than the reverse. Witchcraft! WITCHCRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFT!
The people who look through the glass of the Seven-Eleven to count the nigger-to-human ratio before they'll step inside, the ones whose parents sent them to the whitest private schools they could find to keep their little white throats from getting cut, are the ones who scream the loudest. It's called cognitive dissonance.
Man, there are a lot of factors brought up, the prevailing misunderstandings seem to be.
Why Germany and Japan after being decimated in Dresden / Hiroshima and Nagasaki came back to world leaders in technology in short years and African nations free from colonial rule for over a hundred years have made no progress and some have even gotten worse!
A point on Eastern Asians scoring the highest on IQ tests, how is the IQ test a "bigoted" western tool of proving themselves supreme if they are behind on there own "bigoted" test?! (IQ tests show intelligence differences from 3 years old prior to socialized education)
Really good points on the Marxist left ignoring racial differences even that there are races, yet allowing affirmative action that is race specific and minimum quotas in some institutions. So which one is it? race or no race? or when it suits discriminating against Indian-Asian-White Anglo Saxon? For disable the race horse to let the plow horse catch up tactics?
It has been shown (even recently) that various external factors contribute to the brain development of humans. Not only are there the sociological factors, but even things like diet and disease play a part. It has recently been shown that places where people don't have decent health care don't show as high an intelligent mark as people who do, since the body is focusing more on developing the immune system than brain development.
It has been shown (even recently) that various external factors contribute to the brain development of humans. Not only are there the sociological factors, but even things like diet and disease play a part. It has recently been shown that places where people don't have decent health care don't show as high an intelligent mark as people who do, since the body is focusing more on developing the immune system than brain development
It has been shown (even recently) that various external factors contribute to the brain development of humans. Not only are there the sociological factors, but even things like diet and disease play a part. It has recently been shown that places where people don't have decent health care don't show as high an intelligent mark as people who do, since the body is focusing more on developing the immune system than brain development
>>27
It's also been shown that brain development and intelligence contribute to the ability to build a society where decent health care is available.
This is why niggers never created the wheel or a written language, or built a city with stone walls, or practiced agriculture, wove cloth, or domesticated animals before the Arabs taught them only a few hundred years ago.
Are they even human? The ability to interbreed means nothing. Dogs and wolves, housecats and bobcats, tigers and lions, horses and donkeys, can interbreed, yet are clearly different species.
>>31 This is why niggers never created the wheel or a written language, or built a city with stone walls, or practiced agriculture, wove cloth, or domesticated animals before the Arabs taught them only a few hundred years ago.
Proof?
African History. Until Arabs and whites, they were living the stoneage life and didn't even make rock paintings. But whatever -- TV says otherwise and you're too stupid to read.
Name:
Anonymous2010-08-05 22:34
>>33 African History. Until Arabs and whites, they were living the stoneage life and didn't even make rock paintings.
Proof? But whatever -- TV says otherwise and you're too stupid to read.
I don't watch television, and you don't even know who I am. Nevertheless, that doesn't absolve you of your obligation to provide relevant sources as the burden of proof is on you.
Name:
Anonymous2010-08-06 5:12
Not 33
Proof of What Africans did and did not accomplish is a looooong post to make.
As far as the validity goes, there is two completely contradictory stories massively publicized. One that african universities sprung up in africa and spread their knowledge to greece / Mediterranean. (even rapped in Nas's lyrics)
And the other is of the copts, who slowly developed culture and technology built on older eastern traditions, the civilization eventually became over run by nubians and for the next few dynasties shrunk and decayed.
From what I have read, second is far more true, to say though that Africans did not even make rock paintings may be going far, invention and civilization for Africans don't stack up in evidence and It is very difficult to supply a lack of evidence, rather evidence that someone elses "burden of proof" is flawed.
>>35
I see, and agree. As far as the validity goes, there is two completely contradictory stories massively publicized.
Indeed. Nobody absolutely knows for sure. Until enough historical and archeological evidence is uncovered, studied, carbon-dated, and data collected into peer-reviewed, scientifically analyzed papers and journals by multiple parties, there will never be a reasonable, beyond the shadow of a doubt, conclusion on the subject.
All the reason why >>31,33 should know better than to spout such crap. Just because there's no evidence that Africans hadn't built civilization on their own without external support, does not offer proof in and of itself that such never happened, to think otherwise is just plain academic dishonesty.
HOw long are we supposed to wait for science to dig up a single niggertopia? We can't find any writing systems outside of North Africa. We haven't found ruins of major cities, we haven't found evidence of nigger philosophy. After 100 years of finding nothing, I think it's pretty safe to say we won't find anything.
>>37 Argumentum ad ignorantiam (argument to ignorance), a logical fallacy assuming that because no evidence has been found for civilization in Africa beyond the northern section of the continent, proves that there was never a type of civilization there at all. A most fallacious argument indeed.
Archeological discoveries happen from time to time, and who knows? There may even been found a long lost underwater city off the coast of Namibia or Mozambique.
Name:
Anonymous2010-08-07 9:39
>>38 Argumentum ad ignorantiam (argument to ignorance), a logical fallacy assuming that because no lack of evidence has been found for civilization in sub-saharan Africa, this proves that there was a civilization there. A most fallacious argument indeed.
Name:
Anonymous2010-08-07 13:27
>>38
"But you can't PROVE there isn't a teacup orbiting Mars! PROVE IT PROVE IT PROVE IT PROVE IT YOU FAGGOT"
Those who claim the Negro in Africa independently invented the wheel, systems of writing, created cities with stone walls, and exhibited other traits linking them with humanity must prove their assertions. The burden of proof is upon them, not us.