>>35
I see, and agree.
As far as the validity goes, there is two completely contradictory stories massively publicized.
Indeed. Nobody absolutely knows for sure. Until enough historical and archeological evidence is uncovered, studied, carbon-dated, and data collected into peer-reviewed, scientifically analyzed papers and journals by multiple parties, there will never be a reasonable, beyond the shadow of a doubt, conclusion on the subject.
All the reason why
>>31,33 should know better than to spout such crap. Just because there's no evidence that Africans hadn't built civilization on their own without external support, does not offer proof in and of itself that such never happened, to think otherwise is just plain academic dishonesty.