Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

A new school of thought in marxism

Name: walt 2010-06-27 2:44

Comrades of all creeds and races please hear this Solomon voice in the darkness of ignorance. Though the great strides of history we now pay attention to the this modern epoch to a grand exchange of powers. In the past epochs power was derived for the subjugation of others ei capitalism and imperialism. Now with the use of technology persons of different localities are and can be in constant commutation. though these means propaganda and false clams can be made agreeable to the mass. With my own time living under socialism i have come to the conclusion even though Marxism the subjugation and exploitation of persons becomes an concern. it is this reason and others that i have come to formulate a new school of though in Marxism, Waltism.
 
 
Part one Capital
In the eyes of this school of thought capitalism is not the enemy but instead it is persons in any for of government who would exploit anther human being. Examples of socialist socialist societies having inequality between the leader and the population have be noted in history. in waltism private citizen are able to hold private possessions but as for Capital such as land, a store , a factory , an office , a warehouse etc.... the citizen would be able to own BUT the amount of capital would be a decision by the state.
 
part two the system
By factory and capital i do not mean capital to the size that modern corporations of brought about be rather small business owners. in order to make this social equal the state MUST provide the 7 following items:
 
minimum wage so the society can not have any exploitation form the state all state works would be given this wage form factory workers to leaders.
 
state run factories  By the state giving the population work and the state income the economic status of the country would at lest have a bass line and exploitative tool such as taxation would not be needed (exempt for all but the owners of private capital)
 
state run farms   these farms would as well be a means for the production for the state and a food source for those who can not afford food form the private market
 
free food  this only include food form the government farms , where are  goods such as spices of rare fruit would be left up to private farms
 
free public education until the 12 grade  this is need for an educated population whom can make wises decisions during election processes
 
free state run universities  these universities would provide a means of eduction for those who can not afford private universities
 
 a democratic system with check and balances  even though this is self explanatory , this system MUST BE DERECTE VOTE to make it clear that alienation between the government and the people NEVER HAPPENS
 
and departments in which the taking of private assets that have grown beyond the limits of ownership in the the private market.
 
part three the society
 
this section is to clear some things up. by having small ownership of capital the process of collectivization becomes the best way for the owners to operate but with restrictions does not allow the subjugation of workers though large corporations.
 And in this society provinces are give limited autonomy in order to preserve there economic status but the federal system can draw at time money for them
 
part four the name
 
 
the reason for the name Waltism is because my name is walt or
 
 
what do my comrades think???

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-27 7:27

*sticks finger up butt* *stick finger in mouth*

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 5:11

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 9:11

Never works, you place too much trust in the government. Instead we should be lifting restrictions on economic freedom to maximise efficiency to the point where everyone is so well off anyone can afford these things.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 13:26

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-29 15:57

Nice system Comrade, but as an Anarcho-Communist, I would like to know your thoughts on whether this society would eventually transition to one without a government that is run by the workers, and how that transition would be conducted in the best way possible so Government heads to not hold on to their power and abuse the workers anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-29 18:42

Marx just took French Socialism and perverted it to create governments that rule over the people. Fuck him.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 0:22

>>6
What practical means would you have of representing workers?
>>7
Napoleon seemed to enjoy imposing his will on others, I think tyranny is inevitable when people place "equality" over liberty.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 3:56

>>8
I think tyranny is inevitable when people place "equality" over liberty.
Most agreed.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-06 17:20

Free men are not equal.  Equal men are not free.

Liberty is the touchstone of civilization, not equality.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-07 12:59

why are equal men not free?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-10 5:13

>>11
Men are not naturally equal in intelligence, in willpower, in capability.  The greater the demand for equality of treatment and equality of outcome, the greater the burden on the men of superior ability, who are enslaved and forced to carry their inferiors on their backs all their lives.

In a truly free society, the State permits the best to proceed unhindered and requires the worst to proceed unaided.  The second group dies a lot.  ("and nothing of value was lost")

tl;dr lrn2 Jacksonian Democracy

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-10 10:06

Government must think for that people can use their capacity well, but in the same time, for that almost all people can live in the state.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-10 13:43

marxism sucks. get over it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-14 17:51

>>12
Jacksonian Democracy
So we should go back to just having all White males above an arbitrary age vote and no one else?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-20 12:35

>>15

Which society was doing better culturally and politically.  Jacksonians had a thriving society -- we have the Obama depression and huge welfare systems ready to take us off a cliff.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-20 17:19

>>15
Not all White males.  Citizen taxpayers only.

Look at what that society accomplished, and take a good look around you in the year 2010, at people grown comfortable in their ancestors' worst nightmare.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List