Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-40 41-

All Porn should be outlawed

Name: Needley 2010-03-26 11:15

Because it harms the kids and causes people to lust. Therefor people who are into porn/ make porn should go to prison for at least 30 years..... Better yet would be the gas chamber.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-26 11:57

How does it harm children? Porn isn't the only thing causing people to lust, should everything that causes lust be outlawed?
Better yet would be the gas chamber.
Oh, wait you're a troll.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-26 12:47

porn only causes people to lust if there are attractive people in it of the opposite sex unless you are gay. so guys should only be allowed to buy porn with ugly men in it, possibly having gay sex, unless you are certified homosexual in which case you will be allowed to buy the ugly lady porn instead with no men to lust over.

Name: Needley 2010-03-29 10:07

>>2
>>3

I am not a troll! I'm just shareing the good news.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-29 11:22

>>4
This news isn't really very good.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-29 20:24

because prohibitions have worked so well in this country's past...

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-29 23:53

>>1
the gas chamber
Jew detected

Name: Needly 2010-03-30 10:49

>>7
I am not a jew!

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-10 18:27

All religion should be outlawed.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-11 4:33

>>9
Communist detected.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 18:39

>>9
Hail Satan!

>>10
Fuck Communism! 14/88

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 19:20

>>11
14/88
lol, Nazism. I'll have you know that the Nazis were financed by Zionist Jews mostly for the purpose of sending the Jews to Palestine to create what is now known as the state of Israel.

So in short, you Hitler idolizers have been trolled hard, for the past six decades.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-13 6:39

>>12
So presumably the whole holocaust thing was a hoax.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-13 7:17

>>13
AFAICT; one part sacrificial lambs, one part deliberately bad maths, one part hysterical propaganda (complete with ban on checksums, on pain of being smeared as a sub-human revisionist thought-criminal).

Try this at home: (have someone) say something (even remotely) racist about Jews, see what happens. Then say the exactly same thing about Gypsies, see what now happens.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 4:36

>>14
Whatever the details of the holocaust I'm pretty sure the nazis didn't show them a good time.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 8:05

>>15

But lying about 6 million, then 4 million, then saying maybe 1 million and also taking all the camps outside of Poland off the list as death camps limiting it to 6 camps that were outside jurisdiction. When there is no evidence of one Zyklon B chamber for human, just a few tiny rooms for delousing clothes which have always have been reported that way, there is no way you could do a million people 1 person at a time (Zyklon B takes a long time to kill people and even 5 times the strength that was reported) The honesty firstly makes the Nazi's look like mean captors who use people for labor to best there enemies, not like beings devoid of emotion, evil robot zombies that want every last jew dead no matter what. It also levels the playing field for everyone else afflicted by the war. Gypsies and Turks and Homosexuals other foreigners were all put into camps, just like jews, Jews deserve no special treatment in the case of WW2 but made it all about them and have numerous million dollar museums for THEIR grief.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 2:49

>>16
Yidda yidda yidda, if it were WW2 I'd still be like paddy mayne, flying into a berserker fury and slaying nazis by the 100. Hitler was a nigger.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 11:09

Jews suck nigger dicks

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 15:26

>>17-18
^* African American

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 19:08

>>12 is a jew!

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 23:30

>>20
Actually, I'm a gentile that knows way too much. They're probably tracing my connection right now. Good thing I'm behind seven proxies! :-)

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-16 9:10

>>21
seven proxies
u r pedobear

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-16 9:33

>>22
lol, nah. But searching through top secret Jewish info, it became apparent that they take a special interest in the young ones! No surprise there.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-16 19:01

What does this have to do with wanting porn to be illegal?

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-16 19:52

I agree with OP. I'd be better off with no porn. My life would be better. I'd actually care enough to try to get laid by my wife.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-19 19:18

>>24 Cause jews run the porn industry!

Name: Uniform Fettis Choker 2010-04-24 13:42

Female masturbation all the way!!!

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-30 8:32

>>14
Try this at home: (have someone) say something (even remotely) racist about Jews, see what happens

OK let's see...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMZRugHOQKg
LawLawLawLawLawLawLawLawLawLawLawLawLawLawLawLawL

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-30 20:01

>>28
Jones has spoken out again Zionism, albeit rarely. But he's a jackass anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-09 19:22

>>28
Don't forget part 2 of the experiment;
Then say the exactly same thing about Gypsies, see what now happens.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 21:35

>>30
People don't know too much about Gypsies. Hell, I didn't even know about them too much myself until I started hearing Stormfags bitch about them.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 11:37

>>31
In general: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_people
In particular: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porajmos
My reason for picking Gypsies as an example, is that they're still being persecuted, while Jews are bordering on "untouchable master-race".

I mean, just look at what happens when someone protests the actions of the STATE of Israel. More specifically, see how long it takes from such criticism takes pace (especially during some Israel-Palestine war, and over the [em]way[/em] Israel is waging that war), until some sort of poll informs us that "anti-Semitism is on the rise"...

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 11:39

>>32
[em]way[/em]
Aww crap, been doing HTML (by hand) too long again...

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 12:53

"Because it harms the kids and causes people to lust. Therefor people who are into porn/ make porn should go to prison for at least 30 years..... Better yet would be the gas chamber."

Honestly that is the stupidest reason I have ever read for anything. Lust is a emotion. You cannot shut if off or deny it. This is not some Christian Utopia we live in, its called planet Earth. Maybe you need to check your ticket and take a flight back.

PORN! Because it is a freedom.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 19:03

>>34
OP is a jew!

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 22:11

>>35
I thought the conspiracy was that Jews run the porn industry. Going by this logic, if OP was Jewish, why would he despise the material he produces?

Name: Needley 2010-05-13 10:47

>>35
>>36

No, i'm not jewish.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 12:29

If people try to repress basic human emotions, nothing good can come from it and it will cause more problems

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 19:58

>>38

Removal of porn will not repress human emotions, they will make them leak out in to the public sphere, which is, depending on the individual, positive and/or negative.

In the positive sense, truthfully, a LOT of guys are insecure and watch porn as a means of satisfying something they couldn't naturally satisfy, without it, the natural urge will implore them to talk to the opposite sex.

In a negative sense, it will make people with weird fetishes or mindsets on specific interactions with the opposite sex come out more, but we have laws against rape and the like to protect people.

Porn is more unnatural than natural. We have evolved without it, which shows us undeniably that we are a species that is meant to lust over and be caused by the emotion/sensation or what ever you would like to call the chemical reactions, to go out and find a mate to do prod incessantly at/in and be 'successful' via this.

Name: PORNMANIAC 2010-05-13 20:39

Either the kid looks at porn and develops a mature understanding of sex, or you shelter him from sex and the day he is exposed to it, he freaks the fuck out and turns into some sexual deviant or kills himself.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 22:43

>>40

Oh shit, I'm sorry but, you are telling me that:

All children pre 1950 were sexual deviants or committed suicide.

Hmm, seems like you don't know what the FUCK you are talking about retard.

Logic prevails, communistic perversion of facts does not faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 23:44

>>41
Rude! That is quite belligerent of you, mister. Though, I agree. If there were sexual deviants back then, they most likely kept it very discreet.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 18:39

>>39
You sound like a fascist.

Name: CoorsMan 2010-05-15 5:39

You sound like your daughter got knocked up by a black dude. Fuck off fag needley

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 6:59

>>42

Sorry, getting very frustrated by people proving the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

His statement was so matter of fact, I deconstructed it rather that boasted on how I know how it is .But I have also done clinical psychology and read on how porn affects neuro-plasticity. I am not an expert on the subject, but Porn simply is a NEW outlet for lust, it may even have a positive effect on society that I cannot see, but my initial analysis shows it to be a type of experience that steals from real experiences and takes away from character depth in the same way that Twilight misrepresents relationships, creates a false experience and takes away from real experiences for these young girls to find the perfect angst filled sparkly vampire fag relationship.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 7:29

>>45
I see. Also, reading about the Dunning-Kruger Effect that you just mentioned just now. Interesting stuff.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 12:20

>>38
If people try to repress basic human emotions, nothing good can come from it and it will cause more problems
Except for the racists babies...
http://cofcc.org/2010/05/newsweek-bites-the-dust/
There's No Place For Hate...
Not even in the uterus of ur fucking mother.
Screw the racists nasciturus.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 14:15

>>47

I might look like a retard...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dgfm8iWrY_4

but at least I'm not a RACIST ^^
http://isteve.blogspot.com/2010/04/cure-for-race-realism-discovered.html

HURR DURRR =p

Inb4getback2/b/pls

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 18:00

>>48
What about us rare breed of anti-racists who are against ALL forms of racism, including racism against whites, and the anti-white bias in mainstream media?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-16 3:21

>>49

You do not exist!

Can't...

How?

...

It doesn't make sense.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-16 3:36

>>48

WS syndrome is fascinating. The sad fact for people with WS in this world may be that they are very sociable and accepting of strangers, which in this world will in various cases lead them to being stolen from beaten up and sexually abused. If you have a child with WS they need a loving parent and will definitely reciprocate it!

I actually love 47's point on this.

Repressing racism is okay but Lust is not?

There has shown to be links to racism in 'nature' scientifically, (in recognition) and it is not entirely nurture as they would like people to believe. The lefty's have gone mad to actually post it into mass media as they want to promote the nurture avenue, if racism is natural to a species/sub-species, social reform is mandatory and the change would either be, genocide of the unacceptable trait, or a situation that catered to it, like private villages for all people with the 'racist' genes, censored advertising for their sake, etc.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-16 18:09

>>50
You do not exist!
I assure you, there are some of us out there. You just haven't run into one yet, until now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-17 1:27

>>52

Very hard to believe that people can be completely objective in terms of race, more often than not people convince themselves that they are objectively looking at it anyway.

I think I am fairly objective, but people would disagree with my perspective as objective anyway. I think it is reasonable for individual cultures to sustain themselves in segregated homelands if they wish to, I am talking about my people, Europeans, who among the world are being crowded by others in every space they inhabit. I think this is reasonable as well for every indigenous people through out the world in their home, does that have bias?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-17 2:15

>>53
does that have bias?
I see nothing wrong with that in terms of the nations of continental Europe, being that that is the homeland continent of Whites as Africa is the homeland continent of Blacks. Though, in the new world, (that is comprising of the Americas, specially the nations of the United States and Canada, the area of Oceania that comprises the nations of Australia, New Zealand, and Tasmania), that is of a different story and issue altogether (though, if you'd like to discuss that as well, be my guest)

I couldn't really dispense advice on how to implement such a policy on continental Europe, perhaps the newly emigrated could be turned around back, but what of those non-Whites who are now well into their third generation and quite assimilated into European society?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-18 0:08

>>54

I'm sure my view point of the Americas and Oceania etc are similar, the indigenous deserve security.

Sadly, I view emotional ties as less valuable than truth.

I would not like to remove those imbedded in to the society, if they were culturally assimilated, it wouldn't make too much difference. But not letting the balance slip is more important than making a people feel at home, in the grand scheme of an ethnic groups culture and heritage being protected.

Saying: "It would be better if a a group were allowed to keep their Swedish country Swedish (for example) but it would be 'hard' to move outsiders". Is right, but it is more worthwhile than not, albeit's connotations and difficulties.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-18 14:39

>>55
I'm sure my view point of the Americas and Oceania etc are similar, the indigenous deserve security.
Oh, in that case, I certainly agree.