Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Republicans!

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-21 21:27

Republicans!

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-21 23:24

Yay?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-22 1:12

How about that health care bill? I shall be watching Fox News for some serious lulz in the next few days.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-22 1:37

>>3
lulz
Back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-22 1:48

Conservatives?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-22 12:11

Faggots?

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-01 17:31

OH DEM REPUBLICANS

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-01 18:21

Republicans

Name: King Ownage 2010-04-10 19:48

They've been owned. You're welcome to live in a democracy now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-11 4:35

>>9
A democracy where democrats are the only party?

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-13 7:33

A one-party system masquerading as a two-party one.

Anyone ever noticed how in America, there tends to only be 2½ choices in a matter?
- Republicans vs Democrats. For the unconvinced, a (usually unspecified) "3rd Party" is said to exist.
- Coca-Cola vs Pepsi. Or, say, Dr. Pepper.
- IBM PC vs Apple Mac. Or Amiga, ST, or something else small.
-- Intel vs AMD. Possibly, what, Cyrix? VIA?
-- Windows vs Linux. Or something very small.
- Christianity vs Islam. Indigenous who? Buddha who?
-- Catholicism vs Protestantism. Or something very small.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-13 12:00

>Windows vs Linux. Or something very small.
lol

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-13 15:57

>>11
IBM PC vs Apple Mac.
Since Apple's switch to x86 architecture, this has become a meaningless distinction. Macintoshes are basically PCs now. PCs that are made to run OS X.

>>12
QUOTE FAILURE

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-13 17:14

>>13
Do not blame QUOTES for the failure of the user.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 17:33

>>9

We live in neither a republic (small R) or a democracy (small D). The U.S. takes ideals from both of these government types. Republicans (Big R) and Democrats (Big D) have nothing to do with the institutions they are named for.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 20:02

>>15
Really? I always thought we had a combination of both. The Constitution and federalist paper #10 specifically state that the Founders intended to establish a republican form of government (the form of government, not the political party), and that representatives were suppose to be elected "democratically", meaning a representative democracy, as opposed to a direct democracy. The election of Senators were suppose to be elected through the state legislatures, but after the passage of the 17th Amendment, they're popularly elected just like representatives in the House always were.

As for the way the two parties are today, yes, they don't stand for neither institutions they are named for, not to mention they don't even follow their party platforms strictly either.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 22:23

>>16
On paper, we are a democratic republic. Things don't work like that in real life, however.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 0:14

>>17
Yeah, that's true.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 1:02

NECKBEARDS

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-16 9:15

Rosicrucians!

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List