Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

ACORN and prostitution

Name: Tiffy 2010-03-16 0:18

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 7:37

What? Some faggot's blog?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 20:00

>>2
The undercover videos the investigator made, which, for some mysterious reason, the TV networks all refused to air.  I guess it wasn't PC enough for them.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 23:52

It DID get a lot of publicity... until it was discovered that the video was HEAVILY edited. In context, everything the acorn reps did was fine. After he was exposed as a fraud, Faux News and the others got real quiet real quick. They cancelled all his scheduled air time, didn't apologize for being duped, didn't even mention that the tapes were faked.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-21 14:06

No more heavily edited than what "60 Minutes" brings you every Sunday night, I'm sure.

It just isn't PC to question the Chosen One and his supporters.  Nothing to see here, citizen.  Move along.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-21 15:46

>>4
There was no editing, ACORN got royally served.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-22 3:47

>>5
>>6
You guys need to do some more research.

1) After a four-mount investigation, ACORN was acquitted of all charges.

2) Every single video of the events that has been made public has been heavily and poorly edited. "Random" AV sync issues, obvious jumping, etc. There are several "raw" and "unedited" videos online, all of them are blatant duplicates of the videos originally released by O'Keefe, usually hosted by Tea Party "activists". The actual raw video from the investigation has not been released... at O'Keefe's request. What does that tell you?

3) The anti-ACORN shit is downright retarded. Most people can't even tell me what ACORN actually is, let alone what they do, and then I still have to explain why the "voter fraud" claims were backwards bullshit. ACORN organizations have helped millions of people, whether those people knew it or not, but now they're being driven into bankruptcy over political bullshit. Congressmen who once advertised their support of ACORN have now disowned them. Rather than standing up to ignorant bullying, they submit and cut funding.

4)
It just isn't PC to question the Chosen One and his supporters.
What the fuck? I honestly can't think of anyone who *hasn't* publicly criticized Obama. He's made a lot of mistakes, NASA being my pet peeve. But so has every other president, especially in the first year of the first term. The only difference is the childish attitude the conservatives in this country have adopted over the last year. The "Just Say No" fillibustering, the baseless smear campaigns, it's fucking disgusting.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-03 5:09

>>7
I can't believe you defend this bullshit. You must be a Jew.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 11:56

O'Keefe is a dick, faux claimed he is a exemplifiable journalist fighting for the truth. All I see is dickless ignorant asshole trying to undermine legit organizations from helping others.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 17:07

>>9
But I suppopse you se Assange as a hero trying to weed out corruption. O'Keefe is doing the same thing.

YOU, SIR, ARE A HYPOCRITE OF THE HIGHEST ORDER!

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 21:45

O'Keefe has an agenda. He's just like Faux News, and I can bet he'll be working for them very soon. He distorts facts to weed out people who tell the truth (Take NPR for example). O'Queef is a punk who attacks only liberals, Assange just plain owns everybody with real facts.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 22:56

>>11
Faux News
Assange has a liberal agenda, as do you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-10 13:14

>>12
Assange's actions have affected liberal and conservative alike. His agenda is definitely not obvious to me, if he has one other than what he has stated.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-10 15:29

>>13
I agree. He's like the antichrist, infecting our minds with insanity so that we'll turn on eachother. Bare in mind that freedom was what started the first zombie outbreak. We don't want another one.

Name: Madame Zombie 2011-03-10 17:16

>>15
"We"? who is this "we" of which you speak?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-10 21:07

Anonymous, of course.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 9:20

he's got a mouse in his pocket

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List