Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

2010 Pentagon attack

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 11:19

Anyone heard of that right-wing ayn randist fascist nutjob who attacked the pentagon?  And how do you think this will affect the tea party responsible for perpetrating such anti-government views?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 11:27

What what what?

Did you get this off the onion?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 12:18

>>2
I assume he is referring to this http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100306/jsp/foreign/story_12184286.jsp
It wont effect the tea party.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 23:37

Any time some anti-government nutjob does something stupid, the left automatically points fingers at the tea party. It's just as retarded as when the right points fingers at the democrats every time some commie/socialist does something stupid. The extreme right and the extreme left both do things that make everyone else look like morons, it is best to just not pay attention to them... or maybe forcibly sterilize them.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 4:30

>>4
Implying there's any difference between the "right" and the "left" in America.

LOL. It's all bullshit. The corporations own the politicians and you're dancing to their tune just as much as the teabaggers. It's been this way for hundreds of years, but its getting worse. The tea party is just a brilliant example of the power of propaganda. The health care industry has poured BILLIONS of dollars into ensuring their monopolies survive. A few million to the head of the Senate Finance Committee, a few hundred million to spread buzzwords like "death panels", and hey presto! Health care reform is over before it even gets started.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 5:31

their just trying to create a climate of fear. another 'terrorist attack' on U.S soil this year imo. they then will use the intoxicated sate of fear to pass something that people wouldn't agree to in a sober state.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 6:20

>>5
>implying obama was trying to fight evil corporations

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 10:15

>>7
Obama's certainly less of a shill than his predecessor, but that's not saying much.

As a side note, let's not start implying on the textboards.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 7:39

>>8
I happen to think ">implying" is a grammatical innovation.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 9:44

>>9
You are THE GREAT SATAN, sir.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-17 15:09

>>10
I'm pretty sure if I were the anti-christ I would have caused a bigger ruckus by this point. I'm getting there though.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-17 21:58

Ayn Randist fascist .... nice contradiction in terms

Name: sage 2010-03-22 9:02

>>12

Ayn Rand = Jewess
Fasce-ism = Goyim doin there own thing
Collectiv-ism = Goyim taking care of there own
Goyim taking care of there own = Not Gut für die Juden

hence the contradiction

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-22 22:43

It would probably be wise not to take seriously someone who can't differentiate between there/their/they're in their writing and cannot put "sage" in the correct field.

Name: I'm a SAGE-ing Jew 2010-03-27 1:28

>>14

Absolutely

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-27 1:36

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-27 1:44

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-27 10:38

>>16
>>17
nigtacular!

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-29 17:35

>>16
Actually Paul doesn't hold Ayn Rand in that high of regard, and neither do I. I would rather read works by Lysander Spooner instead, as he actually went against the government run postal service with his own mail company and it became cheaper than the government run option (until of course the government had that shut down).

Also, I thought the Rothschild conspiracy was that they siphon off wealth of the nation through central banking and whatnot. Perhaps she was a disinfo agent of some sort as she didn't exactly advocate abolishing the Federal Reserve.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List