fitna; Islam in europe debunked

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8189231.stm

So stop worying about islam and get on with your life!

Sooooo...  Al-BBC, which repeats propaganda from Al-Jazeera word for word without comment, which always calls Arab terrorists "militants" or "militiamen" because they're afraid of them, says there's nothing to worry about?

Sounds good to me.  What was I thinking?

"Stop worrying about the rise of nazism in germany and get on with your life Poland!"
Neville Chamberlain, 20 minutes before Hitler declared war on Poland.

>>3
Did you even read the article?

>>2
Rather than refute the organisation debate the statistics and ideas.

>>4
Do you believe everything you read?

>>5
Of course not. But it would be better to hear something relavent to why the article is wrong rather than tangential bullshit.

the best case guys say

"its not as bad as they make it out to be, the actual growth is 85000 to 2.5 million"

that is around 30 times the population! If they say only the 'propagandists' figures are to be startled by they are wrong!

Aboriginal populations survive! you don't see a 30 times population growth of muslims in any other place by white countries.

>>6
What is there for the article to be wrong about? All it does is split hairs over a video on youtube only to admit at the end "The current trends suggest that by 2050 Europe will have a bigger proportion of Muslims".

>>8
So in reality it didn't really debunk the claim of the video, just pointing out that it didn't really give exact sources and quotations. What a misleading title.

http://www.iwantapal.com/

I saw Hitlers Hakenkreuz symbol here in 4chan. Will I have to burn my computer now? (I'm in Germany and Hakenkreuz is verboten)

>>11
The Swastika symbol being banned even in the country where the Nazi party held power, is retarded.

>>9
The title is "stop worrying about muslims", so essentially they are telling me that if a muslim rapes and kills my daughter I should not worry about it because the criminal is a muslim. Clearly this is blatant racism.

>>13
Now now, that's not at all what was meant. It was meant in the context of the islamification of europe. People tend to correlate this with large influx of muslims into their respective countries or Sharia law. Both of which will/cannot happen. It is merely scaremongering to sell newspapers and suchlike.

>>14
Then then, that is totally what it meant. It was meant literally to tell the public to absolutely never be concerned about people who happen to be muslims, this is the BBC we're talking about, a public business which has very stringent checks on what they publish or air.

I don't care about the number of muslims anymore, the real problem is the fact people are intimidated by terrorism into giving muslims special privileges. They should be treated like you would any other normal human, with suspicion bordering on paranoia.

>>15
I agree with you latter point. How would you change things? Ban immigration of muslims?

>>16
Declare radical leftists to be racist and cease all public funding of ethnic, religious or cultural interest groups without warning.