Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Why Martin Luther King Was Republican

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-27 11:42

It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans. Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four S's: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s.

During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman's issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military.


Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a "trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King was a Republican. It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860s, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon's 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation's fist goals and timetables. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.

Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans.

Critics of Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater, who ran for President against Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.

Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater also ignore the fact that Johnson, in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on Jan. 4, 1965, mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only 35 words were devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King's protest against the Vietnam War, Johnson referred to Dr. King as "that Nigger preacher."

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats" did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today, some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been "a great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Yet Democrats denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen. Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

The 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began in the 1970s with President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy," which was an effort on the part of Nixon to get Christians in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were still discriminating against their fellow Christians who happened to be black. Georgia did not switch until 2002, and some Southern states, including Louisiana, are still controlled by Democrats.

Today, Democrats, in pursuit of their socialist agenda, are fighting to keep blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Examples of how egregiously Democrats act to keep blacks in poverty are numerous.

After wrongly convincing black Americans that a minimum wage increase was a good thing, the Democrats on August 3 kept their promise and killed the minimum wage bill passed by House Republicans on July 29. The blockage of the minimum wage bill was the second time in as many years that Democrats stuck a legislative finger in the eye of black Americans. Senate Democrats on April 1, 2004, blocked passage of a bill to renew the 1996 welfare reform law that was pushed by Republicans and vetoed twice by President Clinton before he finally signed it. Since the welfare reform law expired in September 2002, Congress had passed six extensions, and the latest expired on June 30, 2004. Opposed by the Democrats are school choice opportunity scholarships that would help black children get out of failing schools and Social Security reform, even though blacks on average lose $10,000 in the current system because of a shorter life expectancy than whites (72.2 years for blacks vs. 77.5 years for whites).

Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30 to 40 years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems. More than $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty. Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Republicans.

In order to break the Democrats' stranglehold on the black vote and free black Americans from the Democrat Party's economic plantation, we must shed the light of truth on the Democrats. We must demonstrate that the Democrat Party policies of socialism and dependency on government handouts offer the pathway to poverty, while Republican Party principles of hard work, personal responsibility, getting a good education and ownership of homes and small businesses offer the pathway to prosperity.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-28 14:21

Thanks for posting this.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-28 18:08

Monkey Looter Koon was a Communist and a Soviet agent, which is why the FBI files on him are still sealed almost fifty years after his death.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-28 22:40

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-29 10:13

It's equivocating to say thatthe democrats today are at all similar to the democrats you're talking about.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-29 11:40

>>5
The Democratic party descends from the anti-Federalists who opposed the Constitution because they believed it would allow the central government to have significantly too much power over the affairs of the states and their governments.  Might even return to a monarchy, literal or figurative, around the word of the Executive Branch, they worried.  They were also very worried about the federal court system and the national/federal bank proposed by Alexander Hamilton.  (This is all opposed to the Articles of Confederation which granted vacuous power over the States, making it essentially useless as a governing system charter.)

Oh, how times have changed.

Not to say that the anti-Federalist efforts were in vain.  They inadvertently fostered the Bill of Rights, which ironically pushed the Constitution to ratification despite their complete opposition to that very outcome.  Most of them later evolved into a non-party that opposed things that President Washington did.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-29 12:21

>>6
I always wondered if the anti-Federalists were alive today, what they would have to say about the current events going on now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 12:25

You can’t talk about ending the slums without first saying profit must be taken out of slums. You’re really tampering and getting on dangerous ground because you are messing with folk then. You are messing with captains of industry… Now this means that we are treading in difficult water, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong…with capitalism… There must be a better distribution of wealth and maybe America must move toward a Democratic Socialism.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 14:43

You can't talk about ending the slums without first saying niggers must be taken out of America, because they create slums wherever they go.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 15:38

>>9
* African Americans

Also, http://i46.tinypic.com/2czcacw.jpg

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 18:27

>>8
Half the things you said make no sense, but I'm sure the other half was wrong anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-31 4:35

>>8
>implying that saying that things are wrong with capitalism is somehow dangerous
Why do the evil capitalist plutocracy let Michael Moore documentaries and shit like "fight club", "american beauty" and "office space" (all a decade old now and fully conformist) get through?

gb2 1850, fag

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-31 5:08

>>12
>implying
Back to the imageboards, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-31 6:33

>>13
>implying you are king of the internets and everyone must obey your commands

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-31 6:48

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-31 8:22

>>15
>implying I don't know where /b/ is

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-31 8:23

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-03 19:45

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-03 20:48

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-04 2:32

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-04 12:06

>>20
* African American

Get out, Stormfag. This is suppose to be the year without Stormfag posters.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-04 12:50

This trend of posting just links is starting to piss me off.  This is a text board, and if you're not literate enough to write your own post, then you need to keep your fucking lazy mouth shut.  Of course supporting your point with links or quotes is fine.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-04 16:24

>>22
Stromfronters be trolling! Have to keep 'em at bay!

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-04 19:39

>>23
This is accomplished more effectively by ignoring their nonsense, or engaging them and giving them enough rope to lynch themselves, as it were.  A subtle, well thought out, well written comment is usually enough to elicit a response that illustrates just how ignorant and angry they are.  They believe the things they do because they're easily outsmarted and manipulated by sites like stormfront. 
How many stormfronters does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
0.  Stormfronters can't change lightbulbs, because that job was taken by immigrants, and affirmative action.
0.  Stormfronters use torches and burn crosses for light.
0.  It doesn't matter to stormfronters, 'cause they cant see the light
1. But the whole time he's blaming Jews for the bulb burning out.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-05 1:44

>>21
>implying i actually am a stormfag
your resistance only makes me harder

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-05 1:46

>>24
No, it's accomplished by not giving me ammunition. Butthurt whining whenever someone so much as deviates 1 millimetre from established PC doctrine is only going to motivate me to be as bigoted and offensive as possible.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-05 1:56

>>25
>implying
Back to the imageboards, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-05 1:58

>>26
You're just trolling. You do that to incite a reaction and you know it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-05 2:54

>>28
Yes, I incite the emotions that give you the irrational opinion in the first place, thus making you more irrational causing you to generate more lulz.

There are only 2 ways to end this cycle.

1: Flee.
2: Admit you are wrong and make your opinion rational so it cannot be ripped apart for lulz.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-05 16:17

>>20

Neegrows are too dumb to use Photoshop, THEREFORE JEWS

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-05 23:46

>>29
lulz
Back to /b/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-05 23:47

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-06 4:13

OP : It's called political realignment. In the case of the Democrats and Republicans it happened mostly between FDR and Reagan. Before FDR, you had conservatives and progressives in both parties, and you had a few other parties too. After Reagan's election the Republican party got pretty much devoid of any progressives (yet they still worship Lincoln, go figure..) while the Democratic party kept a few conservatives.

The more you know
=================*

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-06 12:13

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-06 14:32

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-07 21:34

he had a dream.

Name: QuestionC 2010-02-08 6:55

tl;dr:

Democrats supported the Civil Rights Act.  Republicans opposed the Civil Rights Act.

Democrats got black votes.  Republicans got scared old people's votes.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-08 6:59

>>37
cool story bro

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-08 13:26

The original Republican party was very left-wing.

The original Democrat party was very right-wing.

They have since switched.

L2History.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 12:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 2:02

>>39
why did they switch? the nigger vote?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 2:44

>>41
* African American
Also, see you next year, Stormfronter!

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List