>>90
(
>>88 here), I don't advocate for violence, so I don't know where you're getting that from. I was just stating that nobody has the ability to opt out of certain programs like Social Security. As soon as you're born, you're given a nine digit number that you are obligated to remember for the rest of your natural life, that you cannot opt out of, nor did you consent to be a part of it in the first place. That is tyranny.
Though, hypothetically, if one were given the choice to opt out, then I would support that. I also would keep Social Security for the time being for those it was promised to (elderly already receiving Social Security payments, and baby boomers who are soon to be recipients) and the current young generation the option to opt out, since they're not going to receive all that they put in to it anyway.