>>87
>>88
>>89
My system is not the current system so I fail to see why you are arguing against me.
I don't need to "demonize" these systems. They've done that to themselves
Ok, so you admit you think in absolutes and cannot distinguish petty emotions about from rational thoughts.
So what violent oppressive measures will you undertake to prevent people committing blasphemy and supporting things we have under the current system? If you intend to give them the freedom to have alternatives but deny them the freedom to conform to certain elements in the current system then you will need to use coercion to stop them.
For instance if someone says "we need a speed limit on this motorway", how would you torture them to death to serve as an example to others who dare conform to anyone other than you? Boiling alive? Impalement?
Under my system of course people would be free to have a social security system, they would just not be able to force it on everyone else, so you could opt out of social security if you wish. I'm just saying you should think this through and be logical, that's all.