What do you think about the full body scan (being) introduced at airports?
Improved security or needless invasion of privacy?
Next time, a terrorists swallows a bomb or hides one in the anus they'll try to enforce a 100% check on everyone.
I am fine with a full body scan, but where is this "improved security" going to end? Flight is important to us, and taking it away now is like telling everyone that their cars can no longer be used; You can expect a riot.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-09 21:59
>>37 >>40
Hah! Here's how to end our troubles with Islam. First, we stop stealing their only resource, oil. We bring everybody home, leave them to their own devices, apologize, then tell them this: We're gonna leave you alone, and we expect you to leave us alone. If any of you come here and kill any of our citizens, or if you kill any of our citizens in any country except your own, then we're gonna kill you. Of course you will probably have died in a suicide attack, so we're gonna kill your family, your pets, and your friends. To a fucking man. When you're ready to talk, you know where we are.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-09 22:44
>>41
But America needs the oil now, I like my plan of killing them all now and pilaging their stuff.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-09 23:12
Well there is that. But I'm an American, not a Viking. And the bitch is that Europe is a hell of a lot more dependent on Arab oil than we are.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-10 2:02
>>43
I'm not American or European, so the whole dependance on oil bogles me a bit. I've derailed this thread enough already so I'll leave it alone now to get back on topic.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-10 13:00
How stupid one have to be to believe that muslims are terrorists because someone took their oil. What would they do with it by the way? The truth is their religion is from nature expansive and warlike quite like christianity was in past, so they just want everyone to live to their standards. The only way of civilization is secularization. If they can't pool that out then they will be always seen as stupid barbarians and no one will care for them and their economies. Why is it that some noneuropean countries could become civilized and muslim countries and always a mess?
>>42
Of course, because you're a warmonger with investment in this corporatist racket called war. Either that, or you're an idiot, Chinese made flag-waving, Neo-con Republican voter. Or just a troll. I'm guessing it's the latter.
This was brought on by conservative reactionism more than anything else. It's a blatant invasion of privacy that won't actually do what everyone thinks it does and restricts the freedom to travel even more.
Just to clarify; You can no longer travel on a private corporation's transportation across state lines without being forced to strip/be searched, and present identification to federal authorities.
A life without liberty and privacy isn't worth living. Give us a separate line to queue with no scanners!c(also cheaper fares :3)
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-17 15:19
They are yet another intrusion into our privacy in the name of protection, yet we know that they are not fail-safe and could see airport authorities becoming reliant on a deeply flawed method of detection.
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-02 12:57
Great for an exhibitionist like me? I'll wear a buttplug.
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-02 13:21
>>60
Of course if you do, they'll think it's an explosive, and take you away for more than just an exhibition.
At the very least, you'll miss your flight.
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-03 5:20
I don't see why it is a problem that pedo's would look at naked children as long as they spotted if there was a bomb there or not. It's not like pedophiles doesn't already have victims and millions of videos and pictures stashed. If they didn't have them they would not be pedophiles.
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-03 5:30
ITT: fags don't want other people to find out how small their penises are.
I really don't care what they do so long as I don't get a hand up my ass
You appear to me to be implying the islamists 'attacking' is completely unjustified and unfair. The crusades come to mind. I hate wheels, having your moment in the sunshine (usa topdog) and then having your moment in the shit (middle east) over and over is not good enough.
Can you say your foreign policy has tried to be accomodating, has tried to find a mutually beneficial deal?
>American foriegn policy should be to the advantage of Americans not to foreign nations, and should not bend over backwards because some ass in a mud hut complains
This boils down to old fashioned looting with your phrasing, and while i cant say im against it if its necessary for survival, its not.
How would you go about crushing islam i wonder mm? more bombs, more invasions, nukes? You willing to turn the entire middle east islam population into corpses unless you break them completely first? Are you mad? Do you really want to use a last resort measure like this?
>Flawed to do anything in the first place! So you're saying the best security is no security?
I dont know what he meant but i saw it as this. since there is no fool-proof way to deal with the terrorist attacks, it would be better to deal with the root problem instead of constantly inventing new ways to deal with side-effects.
>More security involvment in the airline industry, not nanny cams in your bathroom. You're confusing liberty with privacy again. Expecting to have privacy in your everyday life is to be expected, but when you engage in things like getting on a crowded plane or drive a car where you can control the safety of others around you your privacy doesn't mean shit to me.
I can understand this but you wouldn't have to put up with this if you weren't creating the problem in the first place.
im not the person you've been talking to, which you've prob gathered from my comments already.
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-04 20:52
oh lord. i posted post 70 and its turned out a complete mess. bah
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-06 12:14
>>71
Have you considered hanging yourself with your belt?