Full body scans

What do you think about the full body scan (being) introduced at airports?

Improved security or needless invasion of privacy?

Next time, a terrorists swallows a bomb or hides one in the anus they'll try to enforce a 100% check on everyone.

I am fine with a full body scan, but where is this "improved security" going to end? Flight is important to us, and taking it away now is like telling everyone that their cars can no longer be used; You can expect a riot.

>>39
I don't know how to quote here so this may be messed up.

You want to change foreign policy because in your opinion it contributes to the radicaliztion of Islamists.  This in IMO is absurd, they have been attacking western civilation since the dark ages.  American foriegn policy should be to the advantage of Americans not to foreign nations, and should not bend over backwards because some ass in a mud hut complains .  The root of the problem is Islam itself, and trying to make them happy won't solve a thing.


When I wrote America I was talikng about the poeple and gov't collectivly.  In a round-about way though, they should crush Islam aggression completely and not just do a half ass job of it.  Terrorist problem solved.


Flawed to do anything in the first place! So you're saying the best security is no security? 

More security involvment in the airline industry, not nanny cams in your bathroom.  You're confusing liberty with privacy again. Expecting to have privacy in your everyday life is to be expected, but when you engage in things like getting on a crowded plane or drive a car where you can control the safety of others around you your privacy doesn't mean shit to me. 

Would you clarify your last comment about this being a precursor? Do you think this is just the gov't getting its foot in the door to control every aspect of you everyday life, or just dislike the gov't starting to take more control of an industry and would like to see airline security privatized?