Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Polanski

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 15:56

Ok so Roman Polanski was found guilty in 1977 of drugging and raping a 13 year old when he was 47. Before he could be sentenced, he escaped to France. He gained his citizenship there, but the US had a warrant out for his arrest. He was caught a few days in Switzerland and is now being held.

Now the thing that I don't get is how the fuck other film makers are calling for his freedom. He was fucking convicted of raping a child. How can they back him on this? Its almost as if they're supporting raping 13 year olds.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 16:37

Yes liberals support raping 13 year old, or at least can't be bothered to truely care.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 18:04

They mean that the crime happened so many years ago. So why bother prosecuting him for it now?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 21:56

If it doesn't fit, you must acquit

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-30 13:00

>>3
So no one thinks it's ok to rape 13 year olds as long as you indoctrinate them to be communists who think being raped by a jew is ok because jews have been so oppressed in the past.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-30 13:41

>>3
Because he's a criminal...He raped a 13 year old. If he can get away, why shouldn't others?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-30 14:52

Don't you see the irony in the situation of a bunch of Jews talking about a crime being 32 years old so it should just be forgotten?

http://age-of-treason.blogspot.com/2009/09/outrageous-defense-of-roman-polanski.html

Maybe it is beyond irony and straying into chutzpah.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-30 15:07

>>3
They're not going to prosecute him.  That already happened.  He plead guilty in 1977.  They're going to sentence him.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List