>>73
Though race may influence some aspects of culture, the idea that "culture is a product of racial attributes" is profoundly inaccurate. In fact, anthropologically speaking, culture is the manifested phenomena of human beings
not related directly to genetics, putting the issue of race right out. Though both are founded first in response to the environment(geography, climate, diet, etc.)they mostly diverge from there, race remaining mostly constant, and culture continuing to develop based on the groups history, knowledge, beliefs, pursuits, etc. Personally, as a man who is proud of his culture(mostly), I believe that one of our greatest ideals is that a persons ideals, integrity, and actions are what determine their value. Not their race, sex, hair, number of fingers, or any other genetically determined circumstance of birth.
"Global European descended population" is verbose and clumsy. Try Caucasian, or, if you must, the global population of European descent.
Perhaps you don't "blame the niggers and the Jews", but I'm sure you understand why, especially in this place, I made that assumption. I apologize. However, the idea that the media has an anti-white bias is simply unsupportable. It's almost exclusively whites who own, control, and produce the media industry in the west. The media(which includes practically all of the information you are exposed to that does not come from your first hand personal experience) is arguably the most powerful tool in human history, and producing pro-black, or any other kind of positive content about other cultures, races, or ethnicities, is not "anti-white". Which brings me to my final point. Our ancestors have been, and often continue to be tyrants and selfish aristocrats. And no, this is not to say that "other races" haven't had this problem, but the fact is that this, combined with our positive attributes, have made us the most powerful and wealthy people on Earth. Now lets bring that a little closer to home. Let's say that before I was born, my Father saw a nice piece of land that some other people were living on. So he took it. Violently, killing most of the people living there, and running the rest off to fend for themselves on nearby, less desirable pieces of land. I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this. My dad builds a nice house, finds gold, has babies and prospers, and all the while takes pot shots at the people he displaced, and tries to convince them that their value is less than his. Long after he's died, I'm still prosperous, owing mostly to his actions, both positive and negative. Can I rightfully enjoy that prosperity without taking responsibility for his immoral actions? The answer is no. Nor can I blame my Father, because I know that he didn't even know that what he did was wrong. But I know. And to protect his honor, and my own, it's my responsibility to try to make it right. The emotion of guilt is irrelevant. It's about responsibility, and nothing retards progress like a failure to take responsibility. What do I have to do? How much is enough? I don't know. But I do know that we're not there yet, because many of the descendants of the people that our ancestors used as slaves, and damaged otherwise still show clear scars. And there are still so many of my fellow whites who continue to damage them. Sure, we didn't make this bed, but if we want to continue to lie in it, we still have some work to do to make it comfy.