>>1
I can try. Let's go. First of all, when you say "but when I look at the Middle East and Africa...", do you mean when I see them on TV, or have you been there. If you haven't been to these places(I have) do you think you get enough information from media sources about what these people are like? Can you really even know whether they exist? Anyway, let's move on. Sub-human. This begs the question What is human. I'm asking you. And if they remain sub-human by your definition, could the differences be related to other influences like culture? If you believe the differences are in fact racial, meaning genetic, please tell me what they are. You can see where I'm going with this, but I'm ready to go through it with you. Sure there are differences, cultural, genetic, and other kinds, but in the end it's just different groups of people, each at different stages of development, some better at some things and worse in others like all the rest. Next problem: But some are just plain backwards. We're ahead in practically everything! Maybe, for now. We use Arabic numerals in the West 'cause there was a time when they were way ahead in math and science. And even many staunch racists believe we're(the West)moving backwards right now. How long can that go on before we start falling behind other groups? Will being behind other groups in terms of technological, economic, or educational development make us Sub-human?