Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

The Bailout help

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 20:52

Hey /newpol/. I'm a /v/irgin who needs help arguing about this topic for my english class tomorrow. I'm not sure if I'm against it or for it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 21:39

Austrian school economics. The Ludwig von Mises Institute is an authoritative source. Link is the right answer in class tomorrow.

http://mises.org/story/3131

Name: RedCream 2008-10-01 23:32

Taking public money and giving it to a bunch of greedy, scheming Jews is a good way to restart WWII.  You can decide if that's good or bad, fucknut.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 0:16

>>2
gb2/somalia/, faggot

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 0:19

>>4
gb2/sovietunion/, faggot. OH WAIT, YOU CAN'T.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 1:16

Silly question but...
Supposedly these fuckers need roughly 700 Billion dollars to get their shit right (at least until they jew things up again).

The US population is a little over 300 Million.  If everyone just chips in $23, and say maybe the richest contribute quite a bit more, shouldn't that just about cover it?

Everyone keeps talking about how this is going to be tax money, but won't people end up paying thousands of dollars extra if they let the fuckers take the taxation route?  (or if they just print the 700 billion won't it result in an even worse tax, inflation, that'll steal away the purchasing power of the people who already have a shit economy?)

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 5:54

>>6
Yes. Most smart people opposed to the bailout are concerned for two reasons. 1) VOLUNTARISM. 2) Debasement of the dollar.

Name: RedCream 2008-10-02 9:24

>>6
Why do you accept that the general public (about 100 million voting citizen adults) would have to fork out $7000 each to cover the bad bets performed by about 10000 Jews in the banks and brokerage houses?

You can't even get your fuckin' MATH done right, so your answer is not required.  You're already too goddamned stupid to return a sane and sensible response.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 10:36

>>5
man it looks better than here all crapy and crap u see homos on the highways asking for money man i wish i lived over ther

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 17:09

>>7
But if everyone just chipped int there wouldn't be a debasement of the dollar, because no new dollars would be created.  Sure it would suck to pay for someone else's fuck up, but... it seems like the quickest way to get past the crisis.  Then we can get on to the important business of stringing people up by their balls.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 18:46

There's no sane argument in favor of the bill. Even the 700 billion figure is completely made up. There is no reason to inflate the economy with more borrowing/printing, and it wont save anyone who just crashed due to their own greed.
The only argument for it resorts to economic terrorism. "If you dont pass it we're going into a depression!" Thats about the only thing I've heard being said.
Let there be a depression then. But don't bail out the terrorists at wall street.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 18:53

>>10
You're an idiot. You're suggesting a misallocation of resources. You have to consider the different ways people would spend that money and the damage that does to other industries when you force people to spend their money in a way that's averse to their spending preferences (in other words, this is WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION no different from every other fail scheme proposed throughout the ages).

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 19:43

>>12
OH 25 DOLLARS!!!  WHATEVER WILL I DO WITHOUT MY 25 WHOLE FUCKING DOLLARS!?!

So everyone in American can buy one less DVD.  Boo-hoo.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 19:55

>>13
Idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 22:47

>>13
I think you misplaced a few zeroes there, Sparky.

Name: RedCream 2008-10-03 18:46

>>15
That makes him qualified to vote in the Congress.  They've misplaced a few zeroes, too.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List