1
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-28 13:39
2
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-28 15:09
I hear this kind of talk on radio shows all the time. You can't predict the future.
3
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-28 15:13
>> It's true you can't predict the future, but then why have weathermen?
4
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-28 18:22
The article adds assumptions on top of its own assumptions to create more assumptions. This is called creative writing.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-28 18:51
>>4
If you can find a better scenario when economic collapse occurs and leads to martial law, then I'm all ears.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-28 22:35
"it has to be" and "would probably" does not count as solid fact.
7
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-29 1:12
That site looks totally legit.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-29 1:59
>> 6
9
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-29 13:40
>>8
The following is a scenario which distorts perceptions of protocols for economic collapse in america less than the article.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-29 13:46
>>9
Where? What are you talking about?
11
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-29 14:24
12
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-29 16:40
>> 11
13
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-29 22:00
>>10
What are you talking about? It's right there! I'll post it again.
14
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-29 22:08
>>13
Can't see shit, Captain. Also if you're referring to:
http://www.wtprn.com/news.html
There are quite a few news items to choose from and none catch my eye as an answer to my query. Click the link to the article your talking about and post it here.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-30 1:22
>>14
Seconded. Are you posting the links elsewhere besides this board?
16
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-30 1:27
Just pick an article that promises to know the future
17
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-30 10:08
>>14
>>15
Retards. Can't you see that
>>13 is just goading you? There is no 'better scenario'.