>>7
That's what I'm saying. It's called READING COMPREHENSION, retard.
Obviously gender/race/sexual orientation/etc shouldn't even be considered in the first place, BUT THEY ARE and it's all the media fucking talks about. There are plenty of qualified people in politics who until extremely recently didn't have a chance in hell of getting beyond very local positions in very liberal locations only because of their gender/race/etc.
All I'm saying is that we need a successful president who isn't an old white male to set a solid precedent for allowing future candidates to be considered on what really matters: abilities/policies/etc, rather than gender/race/etc. Like it or not, much of America is still bigotted and ignorant and they need to be shown that such stupid things don't really matter.